[Bug 24700] New: Should 'foo' be entirely equivalent to [ 'foo-primary', 'foo-secondary' ] from bugzilla@jessica.w3.org on 2014-02-17 (public-webapps@w3.org from January to March 2014)

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 16:29:45 +0000
To: public-webapps@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-24700-2927@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24700

            Bug ID: 24700
           Summary: Should 'foo' be entirely equivalent to [
                    'foo-primary', 'foo-secondary' ]
           Product: WebAppsWG
           Version: unspecified
          Hardware: All
                OS: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: Screen Orientation
          Assignee: mounir@lamouri.fr
          Reporter: mounir@lamouri.fr
        QA Contact: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
                CC: mike@w3.org, public-webapps@w3.org

In other words, if the UA does not allow to lock to portrait-secondary, should
a lock to 'portrait' fail or succeed?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

Received on Monday, 17 February 2014 16:29:46 UTC