Re: [webcomponents] Encapsulation and defaulting to open vs closed (was in www-style)

On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Charles McCathie Nevile
<> wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 19:09:33 +0100, Tab Atkins Jr. <>
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 2:35 AM, Anne van Kesteren <>
>>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:04 AM, Alex Russell <>
>>>> Until we can agree on this, Type 2 feels like an attractive nuisance
>>>> and, onreflection, one that I think we should punt to compilers like
>>>> caja in the interim. If toolkits need it, I'd like to understand those
>>>> use-cases from experience.
>>> I think Maciej explains fairly well in
>>> why it's good to have. Also, Type 2 can be used for built-in elements,
>>> which I thought was one of the things we are trying to solve here.
>> Stay after class and write 100 times on the board: "Type 2 is not a
>> security boundary".
> This is not appropriate on this email list.

Sorry, it was meant to be a playful response to Anne, and as I know
him personally and consider him a friend, I assumed he'd take it in
kind.  (Based on his reaction in IRC, I think he did.)


Received on Friday, 14 February 2014 00:13:46 UTC