Re: [webcomponents] Encapsulation and defaulting to open vs closed (was in www-style)


On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 19:09:33 +0100, Tab Atkins Jr. <>  

> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 2:35 AM, Anne van Kesteren <>
>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:04 AM, Alex Russell <>
>>> Until we can agree on this, Type 2 feels like an attractive nuisance  
>>> and, onreflection, one that I think we should punt to compilers like
>>> caja in the interim. If toolkits need it, I'd like to understand those
>>> use-cases from experience.
>> I think Maciej explains fairly well in
>> why it's good to have. Also, Type 2 can be used for built-in elements,
>> which I thought was one of the things we are trying to solve here.
> Stay after class and write 100 times on the board: "Type 2 is not a
> security boundary".

This is not appropriate on this email list.



Charles McCathie Nevile - Consultant (web standards) CTO Office, Yandex         Find more at

Received on Friday, 14 February 2014 00:08:33 UTC