- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 10:35:20 +0000
- To: Alex Russell <slightlyoff@google.com>
- Cc: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Elliott Sprehn <esprehn@chromium.org>, Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@chromium.org>, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>, "public-webapps@w3.org WG" <public-webapps@w3.org>, Erik Arvidsson <arv@chromium.org>, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mozilla.com>
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:04 AM, Alex Russell <slightlyoff@google.com> wrote: > Until we can agree on this, Type 2 feels like an attractive nuisance and, on > reflection, one that I think we should punt to compilers like caja in the > interim. If toolkits need it, I'd like to understand those use-cases from > experience. I think Maciej explains fairly well in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011AprJun/1364.html why it's good to have. Also, Type 2 can be used for built-in elements, which I thought was one of the things we are trying to solve here. -- http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Thursday, 13 February 2014 10:35:48 UTC