- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2013 10:05:04 -0400
- To: Kris Krueger <krisk@microsoft.com>, Ken Reed <kenre@microsoft.com>, "public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org" <public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org>
Hi Kris, Ken, All - what is the status and plan re Web Sockets interop testing? -Thanks, Art On 3/29/13 10:01 AM, ext Arthur Barstow wrote: > Hi Kris, Ken, Simon, James, All, > > Since the RfR for Opera's WebSocket tests passed, I copied the > reviewed files to [approved]. I presume the totality of the approved > tests is sufficient to test the Web Socket CR's exit criteria [CR-EC], > thus I would like us to start interop testing. > > Kris/Ken - would you please lead this interop effort e.g. > consolidating data? > > James/Simon - can you help gather data (f.ex. run some subset of the > tests, run the tests on a subset of the browsers, etc.)? > > I would like to understand where we have good interop as well as where > we have issues, with the longer-term goal of knowing if we have > sufficient interop to move the CR to Proposed Recommendation per the > CR's exit criteria [CREC]. > > For some example interop reports, see > <http://www.w3.org/wiki/Webapps/Interop/ProgressEvents> and > <http://www.w3.org/wiki/Webapps/Interop/ServerSentEvents>. > > -Thanks, AB > > [approved] <http://w3c-test.org/webapps/WebSockets/tests/approved/> > [CREC] <http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-websockets-20120920/#crec> > > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: RfR: WebSocket API test files from Opera; deadline March 25 > Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 20:00:18 +0000 > Resent-From: <public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org> > Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 15:59:51 -0400 > From: ext Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com> > To: public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org <public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org> > > > > This is a call for review for the WebSocket API test files from Opera: > > <http://w3c-test.org/webapps/WebSockets/tests/submissions/Opera/> > > Note: some of these files were included in an earlier RfR [1]. Below, > James identifies those files that were in [1] but have since changed. > > Note: the *-1.html files in the unload-a-document directory are "helper" > files (that are not directly run). > > If you have any comments, please send them to > public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org by March 25. > > If you review any set of the tests and find no issues, please state that > as a reply to this RfR (so we can get a sense of whether or not anyone > reviewed the tests). > > In the absence of any comments, these tests will be considered Approved > by the WG. > > -Thanks, AB > > [1] > <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps-testsuite/2013Feb/0025.html> > > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: RfR: 32 WebSocket API test files from Opera; deadline > March 7 > Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 13:37:39 +0000 > Resent-From: <public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org> > Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 14:37:06 +0100 > From: ext James Graham <jgraham@opera.com> > To: <public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org> > > > > On 03/11/2013 02:17 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote: >> James, Simon - presumably the test files for the RfR that ended March 7 >> are now reviewed and considered approved unless any of them were changed >> during the RfR period. If any of those files were changed during the >> review, please let us which ones. > > if my hg-fu worked the files that changed from the set in the previous > RfR are: > > WebSockets/tests/submissions/Opera/binary/002.html > WebSockets/tests/submissions/Opera/binary/004.html > WebSockets/tests/submissions/Opera/constructor/008.html > WebSockets/tests/submissions/Opera/opening-handshake/002.html > >> Also, would you please clarify the set of additional files that need >> review? It appears to me the files _not_ yet reviewed are: >> >> * 2 files in >> <http://w3c-test.org/webapps/WebSockets/tests/submissions/Opera/constructor/ >> >> - just 013.html and 014.html >> >> * 7 files in >> <http://w3c-test.org/webapps/WebSockets/tests/submissions/Opera/cookies/ >> >> * 72 files in the subdirs of >> <http://w3c-test.org/webapps/WebSockets/tests/submissions/Opera/interfaces/> >> >> >> >> * 5 - 8 files in >> <http://w3c-test.org/webapps/WebSockets/tests/submissions/Opera/unload-a-document/> >> >> - should all of these files be reviewed (the use of "dash-1" in the >> filenames is `different` so just want to make sure). > > The -1 files are "helper" files i.e. they are part of the test but not > the main url that gets loaded. > >> After the set of files that need are clarified, I'll start a new RfR. > > Your list sounds right. In essence everything under > WebSockets/tests/submissions/Opera/ is ready for review. > > > > > > > >
Received on Monday, 8 July 2013 14:05:33 UTC