[w3ctag/design-reviews] JPEG XL decoding (#633)

Hi TAG!

I'm requesting a TAG review of JPEG XL decoding, a new image format.

  - Specification URL: https://www.iso.org/standard/77977.html

  - Security and Privacy self-review: I believe this only exposes a new image format being supported.
  - Primary contacts (and their relationship to the specification):
      - Jon Sneyers (@jonsneyers), Cloudinary, JPEG XL AhG Chair
      - Luca Versari (@veluca93), Google, JPEG XL AhG Co-Chair.
  - Organization(s)/project(s) driving the specification: Google, Cloudinary, JPEG
  - Key pieces of existing multi-stakeholder review or discussion of this specification: https://gitlab.com/wg1/jpeg-xl/-/issues

  - External status/issue trackers for this specification (publicly visible, e.g. Chrome Status):
      - https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1178058

      - https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1539075


Further details:

  - [x] I have reviewed the TAG's [Web Platform Design Principles](https://w3ctag.github.io/design-principles/)
  - Relevant time constraints or deadlines: N/A
  - The group where the work on this specification is currently being done: JPEG
  - The group where standardization of this work is intended to be done (if current group is a community group or other incubation venue): JPEG

You should also know that it was noted in https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/495 that "[...] a Tag Review wouldn't be applicable for an image decoder implementation.". As there seems to be some disagreement on this point, we're opening this issue for further discussion.

We'd prefer the TAG provide feedback as (please delete all but the desired option):

  💬 leave review feedback as a **comment in this issue** and @-notify @veluca93 and @jonsneyers


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/633