Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] JPEG XL decoding (#633)

My opinion on this is that it's better to favour the "principle of least surprise", and file types that fundamentally do the same thing (such as file types under "image/") ought to be all treated in the same way - I don't see a very good reason to impose additional constraints on an image format for the only reason that it is "new".

Or, to state it in another way - I see making "image/jxl" and "image/avif" behave in the same way as any other "image/*" format to be more in line with the proposed principles than doing otherwise. 

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/633#issuecomment-840531041