Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] JPEG XL decoding (#633)

Aside from mimesniff, the only thing that seems within our scope would be this: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1178058#c5

In particular, whether or not there has been any advancements on how this problem would be solved in a codec-agnostic way, while ensuring backwards compatibility with existing web content. If there is a proposal, we'd like to hear since that would be a pretty significant change in loading. (although this should probably be in a separate review)

We (at least last time I checked) really would like mimesniff to not be a part of this - and if so, please talk to the spec authors. Forcing the spec to update after shipping without discussing the standardization story is how we ended up with most of our past mistakes.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/633#issuecomment-842283108

Received on Monday, 17 May 2021 12:26:53 UTC