Re: [heycam/webidl] record with arbitrary value types as keys? (#509) from Harald Alvestrand on 2018-02-07 (public-webapps-github@w3.org from February 2018)

From: Harald Alvestrand <notifications@github.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2018 14:49:25 +0000 (UTC)
To: heycam/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <heycam/webidl/issues/509/363791850@github.com>

I think that saying we pass DOMString is losing clarity in the interface when we have enums or (limited-range - my particular use case has 4-bit) integers as the underlying objects. So I think restricting to DOMString doesn't benefit us any.
When we pass stuff from JS to an interface, we should behave like dictionaries do and ignore undefined members.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/509#issuecomment-363791850

Received on Wednesday, 7 February 2018 14:51:20 UTC