Re: [heycam/webidl] record with arbitrary value types as keys? (#509)

IMHO, the feature request for a WebIDL construct to support this case is totally valid. It's just not a common enough use case at this time to merit the overhead of dedicated syntax when there is an alternative.


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/509#issuecomment-363924831

Received on Wednesday, 7 February 2018 22:00:37 UTC