Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Alternative proposal for closed shadow DOM (#499) from Anne van Kesteren on 2016-05-16 (public-webapps-github@w3.org from May 2016)

From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 00:59:24 -0700
To: w3c/webcomponents <webcomponents@noreply.github.com>
Cc:
Message-ID: <w3c/webcomponents/issues/499/219370154@github.com>

> Is there a procedure for opening a negotiation in such a case?

I guess you'd have to convince the implementers.

> With the availability of the workaround, the only difference with open shadow DOM is the method of access, no?

I'm not sure what this means.

As for arguments, I would consider https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/499#issuecomment-218716055 and https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/499#issuecomment-219105608 to be pretty clear.

---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/499#issuecomment-219370154

Received on Monday, 16 May 2016 07:59:52 UTC