Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Alternative proposal for closed shadow DOM (#499) from Matthew Ryan on 2016-05-16 (public-webapps-github@w3.org from May 2016)

From: Matthew Ryan <notifications@github.com>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 00:54:07 -0700
To: w3c/webcomponents <webcomponents@noreply.github.com>
Cc:
Message-ID: <w3c/webcomponents/issues/499/219369364@github.com>

> I think it's non-negotiable, yes.

Is there a procedure for opening a negotiation in such a case?

> Advantages have already been listed earlier in this thread.

With the availability of the workaround, the only difference with open shadow DOM is the method of access, no? AFAICT, that was the only advantage that factors in this consideration.

If there were others that do factor this in and that I missed, could you briefly summarise them?

---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/499#issuecomment-219369364

Received on Monday, 16 May 2016 07:54:35 UTC