- From: Matthew Ryan <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 01:02:24 -0700
- To: w3c/webcomponents <webcomponents@noreply.github.com>
- Cc:
Received on Monday, 16 May 2016 08:02:53 UTC
Would a non-normative note alongside the open/closed flag be acceptable then? Something describing that the restriction "is only intended to affect code included by the page developer (and variously code included by that code)" and that it is "not intended to break user-agent injected code that depends on DOM navigability", which may be achieved by "treating this state as 'open' for such injected code" would work for me. --- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/354#issuecomment-219370646
Received on Monday, 16 May 2016 08:02:53 UTC