public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org from January 2013 by author

bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

• [Bug 17645] Define more precisely what the "origin" of the IDBEnvironment is (Thursday, 31 January)
• [Bug 16009] [Shadow]: Specify how CSS behaves in shadow DOM subtrees (Thursday, 31 January)
• [Bug 18483] [Shadow]: Shared stylesheets may make @host ambiguous (Thursday, 31 January)
• [Bug 20836] What happens when a dictionary references itself? (Thursday, 31 January)
• [Bug 20836] What happens when a dictionary references itself? (Thursday, 31 January)
• [Bug 18427] [IndexedDB] Spec text requires index names be unique within database (Thursday, 31 January)
• [Bug 18328] [IndexedDB] Editorial: Clarify that "record value" === "referenced primary key" for indeces (Thursday, 31 January)
• [Bug 20836] What happens when a dictionary references itself? (Thursday, 31 January)
• [Bug 17645] Define more precisely what the "origin" of the IDBEnvironment is (Thursday, 31 January)
• [Bug 20836] What happens when a dictionary references itself? (Thursday, 31 January)
• [Bug 20836] What happens when a dictionary references itself? (Thursday, 31 January)
• [Bug 20833] Incomplete sentence in draft WD-IndexedDB-20120524 (Thursday, 31 January)
• [Bug 14978] [Meta]: Specify how shadow DOM works (Thursday, 31 January)
• [Bug 20839] New: [Shadow]: Typo, "shadow" needs to be capitalized in the first sentence of Navigation section (Thursday, 31 January)
• [Bug 20836] New: What happens when a dictionary references itself? (Thursday, 31 January)
• [Bug 18867] Web developers cannot know whether a key event will cause text input actually (Thursday, 31 January)
• [Bug 20833] New: Incomplete sentence in draft WD-IndexedDB-20120524 (Thursday, 31 January)
• [Bug 20487] [Custom]: Creation of custom elements via createElement is underdefined (Thursday, 31 January)
• [Bug 14968] [Meta]: Specify how custom elements work (Thursday, 31 January)
• [Bug 20831] New: [Custom]: Make document.register work with ES6 classes and @@create (Thursday, 31 January)
• [Bug 20684] [Custom]: Unblock Mozilla's implementation of document.register (Wednesday, 30 January)
• [Bug 20823] [Custom]: Section 3 (Terminology), custom element name (Wednesday, 30 January)
• [Bug 20487] [Custom]: Creation of custom elements via createElement is underdefined (Wednesday, 30 January)
• [Bug 18242] Not clear what "script that invoked the method" means exactly. Should this be changed to "entry script" instead? If not, please specify what it means. (Wednesday, 30 January)
• [Bug 15476] [Templates]: Specify how templates work (Wednesday, 30 January)
• [Bug 20829] [Templates]: The foster agency algorithm should be prevented from pulling nodes out of the template content (Wednesday, 30 January)
• [Bug 20829] [Templates]: The foster agency algorithm should be prevented from pulling nodes out of the template content (Wednesday, 30 January)
• [Bug 15476] [Templates]: Specify how templates work (Wednesday, 30 January)
• [Bug 20829] New: [Templates]: The foster agency algorithm should be prevented from pulling nodes out of the template content (Wednesday, 30 January)
• [Bug 20127] [Templates]: Template needs to disallow DOM hierarchy cycles which can result from template.contents (Wednesday, 30 January)
• [Bug 18045] Based on my experience and from reading many questions on the Web, this API is seriously flawed. It treats cross-domain iframes the same as same-domain iframes, except that almost every operation on contentWindow is an error. (Wednesday, 30 January)
• [Bug 14968] [Meta]: Specify how custom elements work (Wednesday, 30 January)
• [Bug 20684] [Custom]: Unblock Mozilla's implementation of document.register (Wednesday, 30 January)
• [Bug 20823] [Custom]: Section 3 (Terminology), custom element name (Wednesday, 30 January)
• [Bug 14968] [Meta]: Specify how custom elements work (Wednesday, 30 January)
• [Bug 20823] New: [Custom]: Section 3 (Terminology), custom element name (Wednesday, 30 January)
• [Bug 20487] [Custom]: Creation of custom elements via createElement is underdefined (Wednesday, 30 January)
• [Bug 20487] [Custom]: Creation of custom elements via createElement is underdefined (Wednesday, 30 January)
• [Bug 17103] [Custom]: Write first draft of the Custom DOM elements spec (Tuesday, 29 January)
• [Bug 14968] [Meta]: Specify how custom elements work (Tuesday, 29 January)
• [Bug 20801] [Custom]: Section 4, custom element constructor generation algorithm, Step 5 (Tuesday, 29 January)
• [Bug 14968] [Meta]: Specify how custom elements work (Tuesday, 29 January)
• [Bug 20800] [Custom]: [Typo?] Section 4, Step 6 looks wrong (Tuesday, 29 January)
• [Bug 20127] [Templates]: Template needs to disallow DOM hierarchy cycles which can result from template.contents (Tuesday, 29 January)
• [Bug 20487] [Custom]: Creation of custom elements via createElement is underdefined (Tuesday, 29 January)
• [Bug 14968] [Meta]: Specify how custom elements work (Tuesday, 29 January)
• [Bug 20801] New: [Custom]: Section 4, custom element constructor generation algorithm, Step 5 (Tuesday, 29 January)
• [Bug 14968] [Meta]: Specify how custom elements work (Tuesday, 29 January)
• [Bug 20800] New: [Custom]: [Typo?] Section 4, Step 6 looks wrong (Tuesday, 29 January)
• [Bug 15476] [Templates]: Specify how templates work (Tuesday, 29 January)
• [Bug 20797] New: [Templates]: Additions to the "in column group" section duplicated. (Tuesday, 29 January)
• [Bug 20487] [Custom]: Creation of custom elements via createElement is underdefined (Monday, 28 January)
• [Bug 20127] [Templates]: Template needs to disallow DOM hierarchy cycles which can result from template.contents (Monday, 28 January)
• [Bug 20127] [Templates]: Template needs to disallow DOM hierarchy cycles which can result from template.contents (Saturday, 26 January)
• [Bug 16596] Clarify how upgradeneeded works in the .open function (Friday, 25 January)
• [Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt? (Friday, 25 January)
• [Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt? (Friday, 25 January)
• [Bug 20127] [Templates]: Template needs to disallow DOM hierarchy cycles which can result from template.contents (Friday, 25 January)
• [Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt? (Friday, 25 January)
• [Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt? (Friday, 25 January)
• [Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt? (Friday, 25 January)
• [Bug 20777] Getting a property from the global scope polluter ends up in an infinite loop (Friday, 25 January)
• [Bug 20777] Getting a property from the global scope polluter ends up in an infinite loop (Friday, 25 January)
• [Bug 20777] New: Getting a property from the global scope polluter ends up in an infinite loop (Friday, 25 January)
• [Bug 20753] Add hook to createElement / createElementNS (Friday, 25 January)
• [Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt? (Friday, 25 January)
• [Bug 20753] Add hook to createElement / createElementNS (Friday, 25 January)
• [Bug 20127] [Templates]: Template needs to disallow DOM hierarchy cycles which can result from template.contents (Friday, 25 January)
• [Bug 15476] [Templates]: Specify how templates work (Friday, 25 January)
• [Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt? (Friday, 25 January)
• [Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt? (Friday, 25 January)
• [Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt? (Friday, 25 January)
• [Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt? (Friday, 25 January)
• [Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt? (Thursday, 24 January)
• [Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt? (Thursday, 24 January)
• [Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt? (Thursday, 24 January)
• [Bug 20487] [Custom]: Creation of custom elements via createElement is underdefined (Thursday, 24 January)
• [Bug 15476] [Templates]: Specify how templates work (Thursday, 24 January)
• [Bug 20127] [Templates]: Template needs to disallow DOM hierarchy cycles which can result from template.contents (Thursday, 24 January)
• [Bug 20127] [Templates]: Template needs to disallow DOM hierarchy cycles which can result from template.contents (Thursday, 24 January)
• [Bug 20127] [Templates]: Template needs to disallow DOM hierarchy cycles which can result from template.contents (Thursday, 24 January)
• [Bug 20127] [Templates]: Template needs to disallow DOM hierarchy cycles which can result from template.contents (Thursday, 24 January)
• [Bug 20483] [Templates]: Specify the behavior of XDM when encountering <template> element (Thursday, 24 January)
• [Bug 20483] [Templates]: Specify the behavior of XDM when encountering <template> element (Thursday, 24 January)
• [Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt? (Thursday, 24 January)
• [Bug 20737] "Call the [[DefineOwnProperty]] internal method ..." (Thursday, 24 January)
• [Bug 20735] n not defined in sequence algorithm (Thursday, 24 January)
• [Bug 20753] New: Add hook to createElement / createElementNS (Thursday, 24 January)
• [Bug 20746] [Shadow]: Touch.target should be retargeted (Thursday, 24 January)
• [Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt? (Thursday, 24 January)
• [Bug 20441] algorithms not marked as such (Thursday, 24 January)
• [Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt? (Thursday, 24 January)
• [Bug 20735] n not defined in sequence algorithm (Thursday, 24 January)
• [Bug 20737] "Call the [[DefineOwnProperty]] internal method ..." (Thursday, 24 January)
• [Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt? (Wednesday, 23 January)
• [Bug 20746] New: [Shadow]: Touch.target should be retargeted (Wednesday, 23 January)
• [Bug 14978] [Meta]: Specify how shadow DOM works (Wednesday, 23 January)
• [Bug 17648] [Awaiting ES6] Add iterators (Wednesday, 23 January)
• [Bug 20483] [Templates]: Specify the behavior of XDM when encountering <template> element (Wednesday, 23 January)
• [Bug 20483] [Templates]: Specify the behavior of XDM when encountering <template> element (Wednesday, 23 January)
• [Bug 20487] [Custom]: Creation of custom elements via createElement is underdefined (Tuesday, 22 January)
• [Bug 20487] [Custom]: Creation of custom elements via createElement is underdefined (Tuesday, 22 January)
• [Bug 20487] [Custom]: Creation of custom elements via createElement is underdefined (Tuesday, 22 January)
• [Bug 20487] [Custom]: Creation of custom elements via createElement is underdefined (Tuesday, 22 January)
• [Bug 17103] [Custom]: Write first draft of the Custom DOM elements spec (Tuesday, 22 January)
• [Bug 20684] [Custom]: Unblock Mozilla's implementation of document.register (Tuesday, 22 January)
• [Bug 20485] [Custom]: Creation of custom elements via constructor function is underdefined (Tuesday, 22 January)
• [Bug 20487] [Custom]: Creation of custom elements via createElement is underdefined (Tuesday, 22 January)
• [Bug 20684] [Custom]: Unblock Mozilla's implementation of document.register (Tuesday, 22 January)
• [Bug 17103] [Custom]: Write first draft of the Custom DOM elements spec (Tuesday, 22 January)
• [Bug 20485] [Custom]: Creation of custom elements via constructor function is underdefined (Tuesday, 22 January)
• [Bug 20485] [Custom]: Creation of custom elements via constructor function is underdefined (Tuesday, 22 January)
• [Bug 20485] [Custom]: Creation of custom elements via constructor function is underdefined (Tuesday, 22 January)
• [Bug 15476] [Templates]: Specify how templates work (Tuesday, 22 January)
• [Bug 20483] [Templates]: Specify the behavior of XDM when encountering <template> element (Tuesday, 22 January)
• [Bug 20483] [Templates]: Specify the behavior of XDM when encountering <template> element (Tuesday, 22 January)
• [Bug 20737] "Call the [[DefineOwnProperty]] internal method ..." (Tuesday, 22 January)
• [Bug 20737] "Call the [[DefineOwnProperty]] internal method ..." (Tuesday, 22 January)
• [Bug 20737] "Call the [[DefineOwnProperty]] internal method ..." (Tuesday, 22 January)
• [Bug 20737] New: "Call the [[DefineOwnProperty]] internal method ..." (Tuesday, 22 January)
• [Bug 20731] Sequence algorithm seems incorrect (Tuesday, 22 January)
• [Bug 20731] Sequence algorithm seems incorrect (Tuesday, 22 January)
• [Bug 20735] n not defined in sequence algorithm (Tuesday, 22 January)
• [Bug 17649] Address WebIDL comments from Kyle Huey and Ms2ger (Tuesday, 22 January)
• [Bug 20731] Sequence algorithm seems incorrect (Tuesday, 22 January)
• [Bug 20735] n not defined in sequence algorithm (Tuesday, 22 January)
• [Bug 20731] Sequence algorithm seems incorrect (Tuesday, 22 January)
• [Bug 17649] Address WebIDL comments from Kyle Huey and Ms2ger (Tuesday, 22 January)
• [Bug 20731] Sequence algorithm seems incorrect (Tuesday, 22 January)
• [Bug 20735] New: n not defined in sequence algorithm (Tuesday, 22 January)
• [Bug 20731] Sequence algorithm seems incorrect (Tuesday, 22 January)
• [Bug 20731] Sequence algorithm seems incorrect (Tuesday, 22 January)
• [Bug 20731] Sequence algorithm seems incorrect (Tuesday, 22 January)
• [Bug 20731] Sequence algorithm seems incorrect (Tuesday, 22 January)
• [Bug 20731] Sequence algorithm seems incorrect (Tuesday, 22 January)
• [Bug 16833] consider always exposing a "length" property for objects with indexed properties (Tuesday, 22 January)
• [Bug 20441] algorithms not marked as such (Tuesday, 22 January)
• [Bug 20731] New: Sequence algorithm seems incorrect (Tuesday, 22 January)
• [Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt? (Tuesday, 22 January)
• [Bug 14978] [Meta]: Specify how shadow DOM works (Tuesday, 22 January)
• [Bug 20729] New: [Shadow]: It is not clear which insertion point is active and which isn't. (Tuesday, 22 January)
• [Bug 20720] Define HTMLSelectElement.remove() (without argument) to do the same as ChildNode.remove() (Tuesday, 22 January)
• [Bug 20720] The remove() method from Element Interface is overwritten in HTMLSelectElement Interface (Monday, 21 January)
• [Bug 20567] Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt? (Monday, 21 January)
• [Bug 20720] The remove() method from Element Interface is overwritten in HTMLSelectElement Interface (Monday, 21 January)
• [Bug 20720] The remove() method from Element Interface is overwritten in HTMLSelectElement Interface (Monday, 21 January)
• [Bug 20713] Consider speccing Event.srcElement (Monday, 21 January)
• [Bug 20713] Consider speccing Event.srcElement (Monday, 21 January)
• [Bug 20720] The remove() method from Element Interface is overwritten in HTMLSelectElement Interface (Monday, 21 January)
• [Bug 20720] New: The remove() method from Element Interface is overwritten in HTMLSelectElement Interface (Monday, 21 January)
• [Bug 20713] New: Consider speccing Event.srcElement (Sunday, 20 January)
• [Bug 20485] [Custom]: Creation of custom elements via constructor function is underdefined (Saturday, 19 January)
• [Bug 20485] [Custom]: Creation of custom elements via constructor function is underdefined (Saturday, 19 January)
• [Bug 20485] [Custom]: Creation of custom elements via constructor function is underdefined (Saturday, 19 January)
• [Bug 20684] [Custom]: Unblock Mozilla's implementation of document.register (Saturday, 19 January)
• [Bug 17103] [Custom]: Write first draft of the Custom DOM elements spec (Saturday, 19 January)
• [Bug 20485] [Custom]: Creation of custom elements via constructor function is underdefined (Saturday, 19 January)
• [Bug 20684] [Custom]: Unblock Mozilla's implementation of document.register (Friday, 18 January)
• [Bug 17103] [Custom]: Write first draft of the Custom DOM elements spec (Friday, 18 January)
• [Bug 20485] [Custom]: Creation of custom elements via constructor function is underdefined (Friday, 18 January)
• [Bug 14978] [Meta]: Specify how shadow DOM works (Friday, 18 January)
• [Bug 20704] New: [Shadow]: 4.5: It is unclear how to define the shadow insertion point. (Friday, 18 January)
• [Bug 18669] Switch from is= to <tag if a decision has been reached among implementers (Thursday, 17 January)
• [Bug 18669] Switch from is= to <tag if a decision has been reached among implementers (Thursday, 17 January)
• [Bug 17103] [Custom]: Write first draft of the Custom DOM elements spec (Thursday, 17 January)
• [Bug 20684] [Custom]: Unblock Mozilla's implementation of document.register (Thursday, 17 January)
• [Bug 18669] Switch from is= to <tag if a decision has been reached among implementers (Thursday, 17 January)
• [Bug 20486] [Custom]: Prototype don't inherit from interfaces (Thursday, 17 January)
• [Bug 18669] Switch from is= to <tag if a decision has been reached among implementers (Thursday, 17 January)
• [Bug 20332] [Custom]: Rename "custom DOM elements" to "custom elements" (Thursday, 17 January)
• [Bug 17103] [Custom]: Write first draft of the Custom DOM elements spec (Thursday, 17 January)
• [Bug 18669] Switch from is= to <tag if a decision has been reached among implementers (Thursday, 17 January)
• [Bug 20693] Incorrect specification for ShadowRoot.olderShadowRoot attribute (Thursday, 17 January)
• [Bug 14978] [Meta]: Specify how shadow DOM works (Thursday, 17 January)
• [Bug 20693] Incorrect specification for ShadowRoot.olderShadowRoot attribute (Thursday, 17 January)
• [Bug 20693] New: Incorrect specification for ShadowRoot.olderShadowRoot attribute (Thursday, 17 January)
• [Bug 18669] Switch from is= to <tag if a decision has been reached among implementers (Thursday, 17 January)
• [Bug 20486] [Custom]: Prototype don't inherit from interfaces (Thursday, 17 January)
• [Bug 15476] [Templates]: Specify how templates work (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 19889] [Templates]: Behavior in an XHTML document should match HTML (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 19889] [Templates]: Behavior in an XHTML document should match HTML (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 20684] [Custom]: Unblock Mozilla's implementation of document.register (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 20686] New: [Custom]: Enumerate exact requirements for an element prototype (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 20684] [Custom]: Unblock Mozilla's implementation of document.register (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 20685] New: [Custom]: Provide a thorough description of the custom elements, goals, objectives, approach. (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 20487] [Custom]: Creation of custom elements via createElement is underdefined (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 20486] [Custom]: Prototype don't inherit from interfaces (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 20490] [Custom]: Things that mutate the DOM tree should queue observer records (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 20485] [Custom]: Creation of custom elements via constructor function is underdefined (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 20489] [Custom]: Nothing ever defines what the "custom element name" of a random element is (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 20684] [Custom]: Unblock Mozilla's implementation of document.register (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 17103] [Custom]: Write first draft of the Custom DOM elements spec (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 14968] [Meta]: Specify how custom elements work (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 20684] [Custom]: Unblock Mozilla's implementation of document.register (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 14968] [Meta]: Specify how custom elements work (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 20684] New: [Custom]: Unblock Mozilla's implementation of document.register (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 17103] [Custom]: Write first draft of the Custom DOM elements spec (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 20346] [Custom]: "prototype" as an identifier in the ElementRegistrationOptions is invalid according to WebIDL (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 18511] [Custom]: Things to Consider in the Future (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 14968] [Meta]: Specify how custom elements work (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 15551] Consider attribute forwarding (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 17103] [Custom]: Write first draft of the Custom DOM elements spec (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 18511] [Custom]: Things to Consider in the Future (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 18511] [Custom]: Things to Consider in the Future (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 14968] [Meta]: Specify how custom elements work (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 14968] [Meta]: Specify how custom elements work (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 20482] [Custom]: specify default <element extends> (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 20438] [Custom]: consider adding "inserted" and "removed" lifecycle methods (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 14968] [Meta]: Specify how custom elements work (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 17103] [Custom]: Write first draft of the Custom DOM elements spec (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 20397] [Custom]: Consider changing elementupgrade to a mutation observer (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 14968] [Meta]: Specify how custom elements work (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 20330] [Custom]: Remove the "Terminology" section (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 17103] [Custom]: Write first draft of the Custom DOM elements spec (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 14968] [Meta]: Specify how custom elements work (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 20329] [Custom]: Specify more callback-ey type for document.register return type (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 17103] [Custom]: Write first draft of the Custom DOM elements spec (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 14968] [Meta]: Specify how custom elements work (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 20491] [Custom]: Need to actually define the upgrade algorithm so it's interoperably implementable (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 17103] [Custom]: Write first draft of the Custom DOM elements spec (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 17103] [Custom]: Write first draft of the Custom DOM elements spec (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 14968] [Meta]: Specify how custom elements work (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 17103] [Custom]: Write first draft of the Custom DOM elements spec (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 14968] [Meta]: Specify how custom elements work (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 20488] [Custom]: Need to define what happens when nodes are adopted into or out of documents that have custom element definitions (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 14968] [Meta]: Specify how custom elements work (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 17103] [Custom]: Write first draft of the Custom DOM elements spec (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 20487] [Custom]: Creation of custom elements via createElement is underdefined (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 20486] [Custom]: Prototype don't inherit from interfaces (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 14968] [Meta]: Specify how custom elements work (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 20485] [Custom]: Creation of custom elements via constructor function is underdefined (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 20683] [Packaging]: Specify how Web Components are packaged (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 14968] [Meta]: Specify how custom elements work (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 20468] [Packaging]: specify link rel="components" (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 17103] [Custom]: Write first draft of the Custom DOM elements spec (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 14968] [Meta]: Specify how custom elements work (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 20490] [Custom]: Things that mutate the DOM tree should queue observer records (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 20490] [Custom]: Things that mutate the DOM tree should queue observer records (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 17103] [Custom]: Write first draft of the Custom DOM elements spec (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 17103] [Custom]: Write first draft of the Custom DOM elements spec (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 14968] [Meta]: Specify how custom elements work (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 14968] [Meta]: Specify how custom elements work (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 20332] [Custom]: Rename "custom DOM elements" to "custom elements" (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 20331] [Custom]: Rename "shadow DOM subtree" to "shadow tree" (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 17103] [Custom]: Write first draft of the Custom DOM elements spec (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 20489] [Custom]: Nothing ever defines what the "custom element name" of a random element is (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 14968] [Meta]: Specify how custom elements work (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 20490] [Custom]: Things that mutate the DOM tree should queue observer records (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 20490] [Custom]: Things that mutate the DOM tree should queue observer records (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 20683] [Packaging]: Specify how Web Components are packaged (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 14968] [Meta]: Specify how custom elements work (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 20490] [Custom]: Things that mutate the DOM tree should queue observer records (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 19870] [Packaging]: Ensure component resources are loaded relative to location of component definition (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 14972] [Meta]: Component Model Master Bug (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 20683] New: [Packaging]: Specify how Web Components are packaged (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 20490] [Custom]: Things that mutate the DOM tree should queue observer records (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 14972] [Meta]: Component Model Master Bug (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 14968] [Meta]: Specify how custom elements work (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 15551] Consider attribute forwarding (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 20490] [Custom]: Things that mutate the DOM tree should queue observer records (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 20397] [Custom]: Consider changing elementupgrade to a mutation observer (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 14968] [Meta]: Specify how custom elements work (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 20486] [Custom]: Prototype don't inherit from interfaces (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 20490] [Custom]: Things that mutate the DOM tree should queue observer records (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 14968] [Meta]: Specify how custom elements work (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 20486] [Custom]: Prototype don't inherit from interfaces (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 20486] [Custom]: Prototype don't inherit from interfaces (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 20654] Have Range.surroundContents() work for partially contained nodes? (Wednesday, 16 January)
• [Bug 18669] Switch from is= to <tag if a decision has been reached among implementers (Tuesday, 15 January)
• [Bug 18669] Switch from is= to <tag if a decision has been reached among implementers (Tuesday, 15 January)
• [Bug 18669] Switch from is= to <tag if a decision has been reached among implementers (Tuesday, 15 January)
• [Bug 18669] Switch from is= to <tag if a decision has been reached among implementers (Tuesday, 15 January)
• [Bug 18669] Switch from is= to <tag if a decision has been reached among implementers (Tuesday, 15 January)
• [Bug 18669] Switch from is= to <tag if a decision has been reached among implementers (Tuesday, 15 January)
• [Bug 18669] Switch from is= to <tag if a decision has been reached among implementers (Tuesday, 15 January)
• [Bug 18669] Switch from is= to <tag if a decision has been reached among implementers (Tuesday, 15 January)
• [Bug 18669] Switch from is= to <tag if a decision has been reached among implementers (Tuesday, 15 January)
• [Bug 18669] Switch from is= to <tag if a decision has been reached among implementers (Tuesday, 15 January)
• [Bug 18669] Switch from is= to <tag if a decision has been reached among implementers (Monday, 14 January)
• [Bug 18669] Switch from is= to <tag if a decision has been reached among implementers (Monday, 14 January)
• [Bug 20531] [Templates]: "in column group" insertion mode rules for </colgroup> need to consider template contents case (Monday, 14 January)
• [Bug 20560] misplaced comma (Monday, 14 January)
• [Bug 20560] misplaced comma (Monday, 14 January)
• [Bug 20559] Typo in sequence conversion algo (Sunday, 13 January)
• [Bug 20654] New: Have Range.surroundContents() work for partially contained nodes? (Saturday, 12 January)
• [Bug 20653] Function object doesn't specify needing a "prototype" property (Saturday, 12 January)
• [Bug 20653] Function object doesn't specify needing a "prototype" property (Saturday, 12 January)
• [Bug 20653] Function object doesn't specify needing a "prototype" property (Saturday, 12 January)
• [Bug 20491] [Custom]: Need to actually define the upgrade algorithm so it's interoperably implementable (Saturday, 12 January)
• [Bug 20653] Function object doesn't specify needing a "prototype" property (Saturday, 12 January)
• [Bug 20491] [Custom]: Need to actually define the upgrade algorithm so it's interoperably implementable (Saturday, 12 January)
• [Bug 20653] Function object doesn't specify needing a "prototype" property (Saturday, 12 January)
• [Bug 20493] [Custom]: Need to define, not set the "constructor" property on element prototype. (Saturday, 12 January)
• [Bug 20653] Function object doesn't specify needing a "prototype" property (Saturday, 12 January)
• [Bug 20653] New: Function object doesn't specify needing a "prototype" property (Saturday, 12 January)
• [Bug 20493] [Custom]: Need to define, not set the "constructor" property on element prototype. (Friday, 11 January)
• [Bug 20493] [Custom]: Need to define, not set the "constructor" property on element prototype. (Friday, 11 January)
• [Bug 20493] [Custom]: Need to define, not set the "constructor" property on element prototype. (Friday, 11 January)
• [Bug 20493] [Custom]: Need to define, not set the "constructor" property on element prototype. (Friday, 11 January)
• [Bug 14968] [Meta]: Specify how custom elements work (Friday, 11 January)
• [Bug 17103] [Custom]: Write first draft of the Custom DOM elements spec (Friday, 11 January)
• [Bug 20493] [Custom]: Need to define, not set the "constructor" property on element prototype. (Friday, 11 January)
• [Bug 20493] [Custom]: Need to define, not set the "constructor" property on element prototype. (Friday, 11 January)
• [Bug 20493] [Custom]: Custom constructor setup in the spec is wrong (Friday, 11 January)
• [Bug 18669] Switch from is= to <tag if a decision has been reached among implementers (Friday, 11 January)
• [Bug 18669] Switch from is= to <tag if a decision has been reached among implementers (Friday, 11 January)
• [Bug 18669] Switch from is= to <tag if a decision has been reached among implementers (Friday, 11 January)
• [Bug 18669] Switch from is= to <tag if a decision has been reached among implementers (Friday, 11 January)
• [Bug 18669] Switch from is= to <tag if a decision has been reached among implementers (Thursday, 10 January)
• [Bug 18669] Switch from is= to <tag if a decision has been reached among implementers (Thursday, 10 January)
• [Bug 18669] Switch from is= to <tag if a decision has been reached among implementers (Thursday, 10 January)
• [Bug 20296] [Shadow]: Attributes should not have dashes (Thursday, 10 January)
• [Bug 20296] [Shadow]: Attributes should not have dashes (Thursday, 10 January)
• [Bug 20296] [Shadow]: Attributes should not have dashes (Thursday, 10 January)
• [Bug 20296] [Shadow]: Attributes should not have dashes (Thursday, 10 January)
• [Bug 14978] [Meta]: Specify how shadow DOM works (Thursday, 10 January)
• [Bug 20633] New: [Shadow]: Events that are Always Stopped (Thursday, 10 January)
• [Bug 18669] Switch from is= to <tag if a decision has been reached among implementers (Thursday, 10 January)
• [Bug 18669] Switch from is= to <tag if a decision has been reached among implementers (Thursday, 10 January)
• [Bug 18669] Switch from is= to <tag if a decision has been reached among implementers (Wednesday, 9 January)
• [Bug 20600] [Shadow]: Custom Pseudo-Elements (Wednesday, 9 January)
• [Bug 20600] [Shadow]: Custom Pseudo-Elements (Wednesday, 9 January)
• [Bug 20600] [Shadow]: Custom Pseudo-Elements (Wednesday, 9 January)
• [Bug 18669] Switch from is= to <tag if a decision has been reached among implementers (Wednesday, 9 January)
• [Bug 20600] [Shadow]: Custom Pseudo-Elements (Wednesday, 9 January)
• [Bug 20600] [Shadow]: Custom Pseudo-Elements (Wednesday, 9 January)
• [Bug 20582] Definitions of "valid key" and key comparison are underdefined and not compatible with WebIDL (Wednesday, 9 January)
• [Bug 20582] Definitions of "valid key" and key comparison are underdefined and not compatible with WebIDL (Wednesday, 9 January)
• [Bug 20394] [IndexedDB] Spec should use WebIDL concepts such as sequence<T> rather than Array (Wednesday, 9 January)
• [Bug 20582] Definitions of "valid key" and key comparison are underdefined and not compatible with WebIDL (Wednesday, 9 January)
• [Bug 20619] New: [Shadow]: ShadowRoot (Wednesday, 9 January)
• [Bug 14978] [Meta]: Specify how shadow DOM works (Wednesday, 9 January)
• [Bug 20608] "suppress observers flag" (Wednesday, 9 January)
• [Bug 20595] [Shadow]: definition of distributed (Wednesday, 9 January)
• [Bug 20600] [Shadow]: Custom Pseudo-Elements (Wednesday, 9 January)
• [Bug 20483] [Templates]: Specify the behavior of XDM when encountering <template> element (Wednesday, 9 January)
• [Bug 20595] [Shadow]: definition of distributed (Wednesday, 9 January)
• [Bug 20615] [Shadow]: Clarify 'At the time of event dispatch:" (Wednesday, 9 January)
• [Bug 14978] [Meta]: Specify how shadow DOM works (Wednesday, 9 January)
• [Bug 20615] New: [Shadow]: Clarify 'At the time of event dispatch:" (Wednesday, 9 January)
• [Bug 20604] [Shadow]: Make event's relatedTarget part of the tuple that contains adjusted target (Wednesday, 9 January)
• [Bug 20582] Definitions of "valid key" and key comparison are underdefined and not compatible with WebIDL (Wednesday, 9 January)
• [Bug 14949] [Meta]: Component Model needs an Explainer document (Wednesday, 9 January)
• [Bug 20613] New: [Explainer]: Remove ShadowRoot constructor (Wednesday, 9 January)
• [Bug 20483] [Templates]: Specify the behavior of XDM when encountering <template> element (Wednesday, 9 January)
• [Bug 20129] [Templates]: consider enforcing invariant that templateContentsOwnerDocument is always that of the containing document, if there is one. (Tuesday, 8 January)
• [Bug 15476] [Templates]: Specify how templates work (Tuesday, 8 January)
• [Bug 20129] [Templates]: consider enforcing invariant that templateContentsOwnerDocument is always that of the containing document, if there is one. (Tuesday, 8 January)
• [Bug 20582] Definitions of "valid key" and key comparison are underdefined and not compatible with WebIDL (Tuesday, 8 January)
• [Bug 20582] Definitions of "valid key" and key comparison are underdefined and not compatible with WebIDL (Tuesday, 8 January)
• [Bug 20608] New: "suppress observers flag" (Tuesday, 8 January)
• [Bug 18669] Switch from is= to <tag if a decision has been reached among implementers (Tuesday, 8 January)
• [Bug 15476] [Templates]: Specify how templates work (Tuesday, 8 January)
• [Bug 20563] [Templates]: Typos / formatting reported by Jens O. Meiert (Tuesday, 8 January)
• [Bug 20563] [Templates]: Typos / formatting reported by Jens O. Meiert (Tuesday, 8 January)
• [Bug 20563] [Templates]: Typos / formatting reported by Jens O. Meiert (Tuesday, 8 January)
• [Bug 20605] New: [Shadow]: Bring back .host (Tuesday, 8 January)
• [Bug 14978] [Meta]: Specify how shadow DOM works (Tuesday, 8 January)
• [Bug 14978] [Meta]: Specify how shadow DOM works (Tuesday, 8 January)
• [Bug 20604] New: [Shadow]: Make event's relatedTarget part of the tuple that contains adjsuted target (Tuesday, 8 January)
• [Bug 20600] [Shadow]: Custom Pseudo-Elements (Tuesday, 8 January)
• [Bug 14978] [Meta]: Specify how shadow DOM works (Tuesday, 8 January)
• [Bug 20600] New: [Shadow]: Custom Pseudo-Elements (Tuesday, 8 January)
• [Bug 20598] New: [Shadow]: Hosting Multiple Shadow Trees (Tuesday, 8 January)
• [Bug 14978] [Meta]: Specify how shadow DOM works (Tuesday, 8 January)
• [Bug 20597] New: [Shadow]: Matching poorly defined (Tuesday, 8 January)
• [Bug 14978] [Meta]: Specify how shadow DOM works (Tuesday, 8 January)
• [Bug 20596] New: [Shadow]: Matching Insertion Points (Tuesday, 8 January)
• [Bug 14978] [Meta]: Specify how shadow DOM works (Tuesday, 8 January)
• [Bug 14978] [Meta]: Specify how shadow DOM works (Tuesday, 8 January)
• [Bug 20595] New: [Shadow]: definition of distributed (Tuesday, 8 January)
• [Bug 18669] Switch from is= to <tag if a decision has been reached among implementers (Tuesday, 8 January)
• [Bug 20225] don't allow overridden operations and attribute getters/setters to be invoked on descendant objects (Monday, 7 January)
• [Bug 20531] [Templates]: "in column group" insertion mode rules for </colgroup> need to consider template contents case (Monday, 7 January)
• [Bug 20531] [Templates]: "in column group" insertion mode rules for </colgroup> need to consider template contents case (Monday, 7 January)
• [Bug 20158] Unrestricted typed dictionary (Monday, 7 January)
• [Bug 18669] Switch from is= to <tag if a decision has been reached among implementers (Monday, 7 January)
• [Bug 20582] New: Definitions of "valid key" and key comparison are underdefined and not compatible with WebIDL (Monday, 7 January)
• [Bug 19092] [Explainer]: Typo "inherifance" (Saturday, 5 January)
• [Bug 16491] Add simpler and better event registration system (Saturday, 5 January)
• [Bug 16491] Add simpler and better event registration system (Saturday, 5 January)
• [Bug 16491] Add simpler and better event registration system (Saturday, 5 January)
• [Bug 16491] Add simpler and better event registration system (Saturday, 5 January)
• [Bug 20158] Unrestricted typed dictionary (Saturday, 5 January)
• [Bug 20535] consider removing indexed property setters, creators and deleters (Saturday, 5 January)
• [Bug 13999] [Awaiting ES6] DOMTokenList: allow to add/remove multiple tokens at once (Saturday, 5 January)
• [Bug 20158] Unrestricted typed dictionary (Saturday, 5 January)
• [Bug 18669] Switch from is= to <tag if a decision has been reached among implementers (Saturday, 5 January)
• [Bug 16491] Add simpler and better event registration system (Saturday, 5 January)
• [Bug 16491] Add simpler and better event registration system (Friday, 4 January)
• [Bug 20158] Unrestricted typed dictionary (Friday, 4 January)
• [Bug 18669] Switch from is= to <tag if a decision has been reached among implementers (Friday, 4 January)
• [Bug 16491] Add simpler and better event registration system (Friday, 4 January)
• [Bug 20568] [Shadow]: "throw TypeMismatchError exception" (Friday, 4 January)
• [Bug 14978] [Meta]: Specify how shadow DOM works (Friday, 4 January)
• [Bug 20568] New: [Shadow]: "throw TypeMismatchError exception" (Friday, 4 January)
• [Bug 20567] New: Change [[Prototype]] for concept-node-adopt? (Friday, 4 January)
• [Bug 18647] Add sandboxed pointer lock flag to HTML Sandboxing (Friday, 4 January)
• [Bug 18669] Switch from is= to <tag if a decision has been reached among implementers (Friday, 4 January)
• [Bug 15476] [Templates]: Specify how templates work (Friday, 4 January)
• [Bug 20563] New: [Templates]: Typos / formatting reported by Jens O. Meiert (Friday, 4 January)
• [Bug 15476] [Templates]: Specify how templates work (Friday, 4 January)
• [Bug 20130] [Templates]: <template> within <template> effectively resets the implied context (Friday, 4 January)
• [Bug 20130] [Templates]: <template> within <template> effectively resets the implied context (Friday, 4 January)
• [Bug 20561] Objects supporting indexed properties (Friday, 4 January)
• [Bug 15476] [Templates]: Specify how templates work (Friday, 4 January)
• [Bug 19966] [Templates]: Can the rule for </template> for Template Contents Mode just refer to In Head (Friday, 4 January)
• [Bug 19966] [Templates]: Can the rule for </template> for Template Contents Mode just refer to In Head (Friday, 4 January)
• [Bug 20561] Objects supporting indexed properties (Friday, 4 January)
• [Bug 20562] Objects supporting indexed properties (Friday, 4 January)
• [Bug 20562] New: Objects supporting indexed properties (Friday, 4 January)
• [Bug 20561] New: Objects supporting indexed properties (Friday, 4 January)
• [Bug 20560] New: misplaced comma (Friday, 4 January)
• [Bug 20559] New: Typo in sequence conversion algo (Friday, 4 January)
• [Bug 19966] [Templates]: Can the rule for </template> for Template Contents Mode just refer to In Head (Thursday, 3 January)
• [Bug 20535] consider removing indexed property setters, creators and deleters (Thursday, 3 January)
• [Bug 18669] Switch from is= to <tag if a decision has been reached among implementers (Wednesday, 2 January)

Last message date: Thursday, 31 January 2013 19:54:47 UTC