- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 23:12:05 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18242 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ap@webkit.org, | |bzbarsky@mit.edu, | |cam@mcc.id.au, | |jgraham@opera.com, | |Ms2ger@gmail.com Component|Web Messaging (editor: Ian |HTML |Hickson) | Product|WebAppsWG |WHATWG QA Contact|public-webapps-bugzilla@w3. |contributor@whatwg.org |org | --- Comment #4 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> --- Well the entry-point is just that, a point of entry, it's not the actual code. It's the actual code that calls the method. I could change "script that invoked the method" to "script of the most recently accessed code entry-point", which should in theory be equivalent; would that help? If we did this I'd probably just define a term, maybe "incumbent script", to mean "the script of the most recently accessed code entry-point", with some examples, and then replace all the mentions of "script that invoked..." with "incumbent script" cross-references. Would that work? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 30 January 2013 23:12:07 UTC