- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 23:12:05 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18242
Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ap@webkit.org,
| |bzbarsky@mit.edu,
| |cam@mcc.id.au,
| |jgraham@opera.com,
| |Ms2ger@gmail.com
Component|Web Messaging (editor: Ian |HTML
|Hickson) |
Product|WebAppsWG |WHATWG
QA Contact|public-webapps-bugzilla@w3. |contributor@whatwg.org
|org |
--- Comment #4 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> ---
Well the entry-point is just that, a point of entry, it's not the actual code.
It's the actual code that calls the method.
I could change "script that invoked the method" to "script of the most recently
accessed code entry-point", which should in theory be equivalent; would that
help?
If we did this I'd probably just define a term, maybe "incumbent script", to
mean "the script of the most recently accessed code entry-point", with some
examples, and then replace all the mentions of "script that invoked..." with
"incumbent script" cross-references. Would that work?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 30 January 2013 23:12:07 UTC