W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-web-perf@w3.org > November 2013

RE: Issues list for Resource Timing

From: Jatinder Mann <jmann@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2013 23:13:18 +0000
To: Arvind Jain <arvind@google.com>, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
CC: public-web-perf <public-web-perf@w3.org>
Message-ID: <0b9cd95c2cf74f619e7d5fd1eefe403e@BLUPR03MB065.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Thanks for compiling the list Philippe! I'll review them as well.

From: Arvind Jain [mailto:arvind@google.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 7, 2013 2:20 PM
To: Philippe Le Hegaret
Cc: Jatinder Mann; public-web-perf
Subject: Re: Issues list for Resource Timing

Yes I'll take a look this week.

On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org<mailto:plh@w3.org>> wrote:
I summarized the status of issues related to Resource Timing since June
2012 at

There a few that needs our attention since I wasn't able to find a clear
conclusion. Arvind, Jatinder, if you can have a look at those 5 issues
before the f2f, we could probably avoid spending face-to-face time on
- A resource request without a network connection (James Simonsen)
- Resource request: failure and success? (Andy Davies)
- Missing example to avoid buffer overflow? (Nic Jansma)
- Need to define "networking layer" (Boris Zbarsky)
- resourcetimingbufferfull is supposed to clear the buffer (Juan Carlos

We're already aware of the following one and will reach a conclusion at
the f2f. Note that this is related to the issue raised by Juan Carlos
(see above).
- onresourcetimingbufferfull attribute type and event listeners
(Christophe Dumez)

We pushed the following issues to resource timing level 2:
- audio and video support
- HTTP and spdy
- Web worker initiator type and resources in web worker

Do we have a test for the following?
- 304 responses (Arvind Jain)

Received on Thursday, 7 November 2013 23:13:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:04:37 UTC