- From: Arvind Jain <arvind@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2013 14:20:20 -0800
- To: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
- Cc: Jatinder Mann <jmann@microsoft.com>, public-web-perf <public-web-perf@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 7 November 2013 22:20:47 UTC
Yes I'll take a look this week. Arvind On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org> wrote: > I summarized the status of issues related to Resource Timing since June > 2012 at > http://www.w3.org/2013/11/cr-resource-timing.html > > > There a few that needs our attention since I wasn't able to find a clear > conclusion. Arvind, Jatinder, if you can have a look at those 5 issues > before the f2f, we could probably avoid spending face-to-face time on > them. > - A resource request without a network connection (James Simonsen) > - Resource request: failure and success? (Andy Davies) > - Missing example to avoid buffer overflow? (Nic Jansma) > - Need to define "networking layer" (Boris Zbarsky) > - resourcetimingbufferfull is supposed to clear the buffer (Juan Carlos > Estibariz) > > We're already aware of the following one and will reach a conclusion at > the f2f. Note that this is related to the issue raised by Juan Carlos > (see above). > - onresourcetimingbufferfull attribute type and event listeners > (Christophe Dumez) > > We pushed the following issues to resource timing level 2: > - audio and video support > - HTTP and spdy > - Web worker initiator type and resources in web worker > > Do we have a test for the following? > - 304 responses (Arvind Jain) > > Philippe > > > >
Received on Thursday, 7 November 2013 22:20:47 UTC