Monday, 30 September 2019
- [web-nfc] new commits pushed by zolkis
- Re: [web-nfc] Specify how to handle message as payload (#359)
- Re: [web-nfc] Specify how to handle message as payload (#359)
- Re: [web-nfc] Specify how to handle message as payload (#359)
- Re: [web-nfc] Specify how to handle message as payload (#359)
- Re: [web-nfc] Specify how to handle message as payload (#359)
- Re: [web-nfc] The link to 'focus' is not appropriate (#282)
- Re: [web-nfc] The link to 'focus' is not appropriate (#282)
- Re: [web-nfc] The link to 'focus' is not appropriate (#282)
- Re: [web-nfc] A record might have no payload (#309)
- Re: [web-nfc] reg-name ABNF is unspecified (#350)
- Re: [web-nfc] reg-name ABNF is unspecified (#350)
- Re: [web-nfc] Data Mapping part is missing toRecords() (#354)
- Re: [web-nfc] Data Mapping part is missing toRecords() (#354)
- Re: [web-nfc] The description of multiple scan() calls is a bit vague (#351)
- Re: [web-nfc] How does NFCScanOptions#recordType filter external type records? (#327)
- Re: [web-nfc] Support additional standardized record types (#313)
- Re: [web-nfc] A record might have no payload (#309)
- Re: [web-nfc] Receiving empty NFC messages since Chrome 77.0.3865.92 (#358)
- Closed: [web-nfc] onreading event does not fire in Android 6, although it is OK on Android 8 (#330)
- Re: [web-nfc] Make sure we support sub-records AKA NDEF message as payload (#336)
- Re: [web-nfc] Receiving empty NFC messages since Chrome 77.0.3865.92 (#358)
- Re: [web-nfc] Specify how to handle message as payload (#359)
- Re: [web-nfc] Do we want to add support for writing sub records? (#357)
- Re: [web-nfc] Do we want to add support for writing sub records? (#357)
- Re: [web-nfc] Do we want to add support for writing sub records? (#357)
- Re: [web-nfc] Specify how to handle message as payload (#359)
- Re: [web-nfc] Do we want to add support for writing sub records? (#357)
- Re: [web-nfc] Do we want to add support for writing sub records? (#357)
Sunday, 29 September 2019
- Closed: [web-nfc] Object sent from watch callback is an empty object {} (#353)
- Re: [web-nfc] Object sent from watch callback is an empty object {} (#353)
- Re: [web-nfc] Receiving empty NFC messages since Chrome 77.0.3865.92 (#358)
Friday, 27 September 2019
- Re: [web-nfc] Receiving empty NFC messages since Chrome 77.0.3865.92 (#358)
- Re: [web-nfc] Receiving empty NFC messages since Chrome 77.0.3865.92 (#358)
- Re: [web-nfc] Receiving empty NFC messages since Chrome 77.0.3865.92 (#358)
- Re: [web-nfc] Receiving empty NFC messages since Chrome 77.0.3865.92 (#358)
- Re: [web-nfc] Receiving empty NFC messages since Chrome 77.0.3865.92 (#358)
- Re: [web-nfc] Receiving empty NFC messages since Chrome 77.0.3865.92 (#358)
- Re: [web-nfc] Receiving empty NFC messages since Chrome 77.0.3865.92 (#358)
- Re: [web-nfc] Receiving empty NFC messages since Chrome 77.0.3865.92 (#358)
- Re: [web-nfc] Receiving empty NFC messages since Chrome 77.0.3865.92 (#358)
- Re: [web-nfc] Receiving empty NFC messages since Chrome 77.0.3865.92 (#358)
- Re: [web-nfc] Receiving empty NFC messages since Chrome 77.0.3865.92 (#358)
Thursday, 26 September 2019
- [web-nfc] Pull Request: Specify how to handle message as payload
- Re: [web-nfc] Do we want to add support for writing sub records? (#357)
- Re: [web-nfc] Do we want to add support for writing sub records? (#357)
- Re: [web-nfc] Do we want to add support for writing sub records? (#357)
- Re: [web-nfc] Remove focused requirement (#303)
- Re: [web-nfc] Remove focused requirement (#303)
- Re: [web-nfc] Remove focused requirement (#303)
- Re: [web-nfc] Do we want to add support for writing sub records? (#357)
- Re: [web-nfc] Do we want to add support for writing sub records? (#357)
- Re: [web-nfc] Do we want to add support for writing sub records? (#357)
- Re: [web-nfc] Do we want to add support for writing sub records? (#357)
- Re: [web-nfc] Receiving empty NFC messages since Chrome 77.0.3865.92 (#358)
- Re: [web-nfc] Receiving empty NFC messages since Chrome 77.0.3865.92 (#358)
- [web-nfc] Receiving empty NFC messages since Chrome 77.0.3865.92 (#358)
- Re: [web-nfc] Do we want to add support for writing sub records? (#357)
- Re: [web-nfc] Do we want to add support for writing sub records? (#357)
- Re: [web-nfc] Do we want to add support for writing sub records? (#357)
Wednesday, 25 September 2019
- Re: [web-nfc] Do we want to add support for writing sub records? (#357)
- Re: [web-nfc] Do we want to add support for writing sub records? (#357)
- [web-nfc] Do we want to add support for writing sub records? (#357)
Tuesday, 24 September 2019
- Re: [web-nfc] NFC for access management aka Hotels rooms ? (#356)
- Re: [web-nfc] NFC for access management aka Hotels rooms ? (#356)
- Re: [web-nfc] NFC for access management aka Hotels rooms ? (#356)
- Re: [web-nfc] NFC for access management aka Hotels rooms ? (#356)
- [web-nfc] NFC for Hotels ? (#356)
- Re: [web-nfc] Read NFC Travel cards. (#355)
- Closed: [web-nfc] Two 'ignoreRead' relevant descriptions look wrong (#349)
- Closed: [web-nfc] Get rid of typedef any NDEFRecordData; (#346)
- [web-nfc] new commits pushed by kenchris
- Re: [web-nfc] Read NFC Travel cards. (#355)
- Re: [web-nfc] Read NFC Travel cards. (#355)
- [web-nfc] Read NFC Travel cards. (#355)
- [web-nfc] Data Mapping part is missing toRecords() (#354)
Friday, 20 September 2019
- [web-nfc] Object sent from watch callback is an empty object {} (#353)
- Re: [web-nfc] The link to 'focus' is not appropriate (#282)
Tuesday, 17 September 2019
Monday, 16 September 2019
- [web-nfc] Pull Request: WiP: Editorial improvements
- Re: [web-nfc] The description of multiple scan() calls is a bit vague (#351)
- Re: [web-nfc] Two 'ignoreRead' relevant descriptions look wrong (#349)
- Re: [web-nfc] After removing special record, get rid of Web NFC message terminology (#343)
- Re: [web-nfc] Consolidate the text on aborting a push (#320)
- Closed: [web-nfc] Consolidate the text on aborting a push (#320)
- Re: [web-nfc] reg-name ABNF is unspecified (#350)
- Re: [web-nfc] The description of multiple scan() calls is a bit vague (#351)
- [web-nfc] The description of multiple scan() calls is a bit vague (#351)
- Re: [web-nfc] "typedef DOMString NDEFRecordType" is expected to be case sensitive or not? (#331)
- Re: [web-nfc] "typedef DOMString NDEFRecordType" is expected to be case sensitive or not? (#331)
- Re: [web-nfc] "typedef DOMString NDEFRecordType" is expected to be case sensitive or not? (#331)
- Re: [web-nfc] How does NFCScanOptions#recordType filter external type records? (#327)
- Re: [web-nfc] "typedef DOMString NDEFRecordType" is expected to be case sensitive or not? (#331)
- Re: [web-nfc] How does NFCScanOptions#recordType filter external type records? (#327)
- Re: [web-nfc] "typedef DOMString NDEFRecordType" is expected to be case sensitive or not? (#331)
- Re: [web-nfc] "typedef DOMString NDEFRecordType" is expected to be case sensitive or not? (#331)
- Re: [web-nfc] "typedef DOMString NDEFRecordType" is expected to be case sensitive or not? (#331)
- Re: [web-nfc] "typedef DOMString NDEFRecordType" is expected to be case sensitive or not? (#331)
- Re: [web-nfc] "typedef DOMString NDEFRecordType" is expected to be case sensitive or not? (#331)
- Re: [web-nfc] "typedef DOMString NDEFRecordType" is expected to be case sensitive or not? (#331)
Thursday, 12 September 2019
- Re: [web-nfc] "typedef DOMString NDEFRecordType" is expected to be case sensitive or not? (#331)
- Re: [web-nfc] "typedef DOMString NDEFRecordType" is expected to be case sensitive or not? (#331)
- Re: [web-nfc] "typedef DOMString NDEFRecordType" is expected to be case sensitive or not? (#331)
- Re: [web-nfc] "typedef DOMString NDEFRecordType" is expected to be case sensitive or not? (#331)
- Re: [web-nfc] "typedef DOMString NDEFRecordType" is expected to be case sensitive or not? (#331)
- Re: [web-nfc] "typedef DOMString NDEFRecordType" is expected to be case sensitive or not? (#331)
- [web-nfc] reg-name ABNF is unspecified (#350)
- Re: [web-nfc] "typedef DOMString NDEFRecordType" is expected to be case sensitive or not? (#331)
Wednesday, 11 September 2019
Tuesday, 10 September 2019
- Re: [web-nfc] 9.10.1 The push() method doesn't mention how record data is verified (#277)
- Closed: [web-nfc] 9.10.1 The push() method doesn't mention how record data is verified (#277)
- [web-nfc] new commits pushed by zolkis
- Re: [web-nfc] Consolidate the push steps (#348)
- Re: [web-nfc] Consolidate the push steps (#348)
- Re: [web-nfc] Consolidate the push steps (#348)
- [web-nfc] Two 'ignoreRead' relevant descriptions look wrong (#349)
- Re: [web-nfc] "typedef DOMString NDEFRecordType" is expected to be case sensitive or not? (#331)
- Re: [web-nfc] "typedef DOMString NDEFRecordType" is expected to be case sensitive or not? (#331)
- Re: [web-nfc] "typedef DOMString NDEFRecordType" is expected to be case sensitive or not? (#331)
Monday, 9 September 2019
- Re: [web-nfc] "typedef DOMString NDEFRecordType" is expected to be case sensitive or not? (#331)
- Re: [web-nfc] "typedef DOMString NDEFRecordType" is expected to be case sensitive or not? (#331)
- Re: [web-nfc] Consolidate the push steps (#348)
- Re: [web-nfc] "typedef DOMString NDEFRecordType" is expected to be case sensitive or not? (#331)
Friday, 6 September 2019
- Re: [web-nfc] Support external types as custom types (#278)
- Re: [web-nfc] Consolidate the push steps (#348)
- Re: [web-nfc] Consolidate the push steps (#348)
- Re: [web-nfc] Consolidate the push steps (#348)
- Re: [web-nfc] Support external types as custom types (#278)
Thursday, 5 September 2019
- Re: [web-nfc] Support external types as custom types (#278)
- Re: [web-nfc] Consolidate the push steps (#348)
- [web-nfc] Pull Request: Consolidate the push steps
- Closed: [web-nfc] ID field is called Message Identifier in NFC specs (#344)
- Closed: [web-nfc] Fix spec issue after things from promise guide moved into web idl (#342)
- Closed: [web-nfc] Get rid of special record (#339)
- [web-nfc] SW now has a spec for pattern matching of URLs (#347)
- [web-nfc] Get rid of typedef any NDEFRecordData; (#346)
- [web-nfc] new commits pushed by zolkis
- Re: [web-nfc] 9.10.1 The push() method doesn't mention how record data is verified (#277)
- Re: [web-nfc] 9.10.1 The push() method doesn't mention how record data is verified (#277)
- Re: [web-nfc] 9.10.1 The push() method doesn't mention how record data is verified (#277)
- Re: [web-nfc] The link to 'focus' is not appropriate (#282)
- [web-nfc] new commits pushed by kenchris
- Closed: [web-nfc] NFCReader should contain those members of NFCReaderOptions? (#219)
- Re: [web-nfc] Define internal slots for NFCReader object (#345)
- [web-nfc] Pull Request: Define internal slots for NFCReader object
- Re: [web-nfc] Allow a NFC tap to load a URL with NFC message payload passed to the page (#78)
- Re: [web-nfc] Allow a NFC tap to load a URL with NFC message payload passed to the page (#78)
- Re: [web-nfc] NFCReader should contain those members of NFCReaderOptions? (#219)
- Re: [web-nfc] NFCReader should contain those members of NFCReaderOptions? (#219)
- Re: [web-nfc] How much needs to be hidden from pages that lose focus during NFC operations? (#53)
- Re: [web-nfc] onreading event does not fire in Android 6, although it is OK on Android 8 (#330)
Wednesday, 4 September 2019
- Re: [web-nfc] onreading event does not fire in Android 6, although it is OK on Android 8 (#330)
- Re: [web-nfc] Fix spec issue after things from promise guide moved into web idl (#342)
- Re: [web-nfc] ID field is called Message Identifier in NFC specs (#344)
- Re: [web-nfc] After removing special record, get rid of Web NFC message terminology (#343)
- [web-nfc] ID field is called Message Identifier in NFC specs (#344)
- Re: [web-nfc] Remove special Web NFC record and use id for filtering instead (#340)
- [web-nfc] After removing special record, get rid of Web NFC message terminologu (#343)
- Re: [web-nfc] Remove special Web NFC record and use id for filtering instead (#340)
- Re: [web-nfc] Remove special Web NFC record and use id for filtering instead (#340)
- Re: [web-nfc] Remove special Web NFC record and use id for filtering instead (#340)
- Re: [web-nfc] Remove special Web NFC record and use id for filtering instead (#340)
- Re: [web-nfc] Fix spec issue after things from promise guide moved into web idl (#342)
- Re: [web-nfc] Fix spec issue after things from promise guide moved into web idl (#342)
- Re: [web-nfc] Fix spec issue after things from promise guide moved into web idl (#342)
- Re: [web-nfc] Fix spec issue after things from promise guide moved into web idl (#342)
- [web-nfc] Fix spec issue after things from promise guide moved into web idl (#342)
- Re: [web-nfc] Accept filtering based on id instead of author record (#340)
- Re: [web-nfc] Accept filtering based on id instead of author record (#340)
- Re: [web-nfc] Accept filtering based on id instead of author record (#340)
- Re: [web-nfc] Consider the filtering names for filtering NDEF messages (#341)
- Re: [web-nfc] Consider the filtering names for filtering NDEF messages (#341)
- [web-nfc] Consider the filtering names for filtering NDEF messages (#341)
- Re: [web-nfc] Accept filtering based on id instead of author record (#340)
- Re: [web-nfc] Accept filtering based on id instead of author record (#340)
- Re: [web-nfc] Accept filtering based on id instead of author record (#340)
- [web-nfc] Pull Request: Accept filtering based on id instead of author record
- Re: [web-nfc] Get rid of special record (#339)
- [web-nfc] Get rid of special record (#339)
- Closed: [web-nfc] Records may contain ID, expose that in our API (#329)
- Re: [web-nfc] Make sure we support sub-records AKA NDEF message as payload (#336)
- Re: [web-nfc] Make sure we support sub-records AKA NDEF message as payload (#336)
- Re: [web-nfc] Allow reading and writing of the ID field (#338)
- Re: [web-nfc] Allow reading and writing of the ID field (#338)
- [web-nfc] new commits pushed by kenchris
- Re: [web-nfc] Allow reading and writing of the ID field (#338)
- Re: [web-nfc] Allow reading and writing of the ID field (#338)
- [web-nfc] Pull Request: Allow reading and writing of the ID field
Tuesday, 3 September 2019
- [web-nfc] new commits pushed by kenchris
- Re: [web-nfc] Reword example to use terminology closer to NFC specs (#337)
- [web-nfc] Pull Request: Reword example to use terminology closer to NFC specs
- Re: [web-nfc] Make sure we support sub-records AKA NDEF message as payload (#336)
- Re: [web-nfc] Make sure we support sub-records AKA NDEF message as payload (#336)
- Re: [web-nfc] Make sure we support sub-records AKA NDEF message as payload (#336)
- [web-nfc] Make sure we support sub-records AKA NDEF message as payload (#336)
- [web-nfc] new commits pushed by kenchris
- [web-nfc] Pull Request: Remove JSON comparison and fix Zolkis' comments
- [web-nfc] new commits pushed by kenchris
- [web-nfc] Pull Request: Add sub-record example and fix idl
- [web-nfc] new commits pushed by kenchris
- Closed: [web-nfc] Support reading embedded records: Add toRecords() (#312)
- Re: [web-nfc] Smart Poster Well-Known doesn't seem to actually store a URL itself (#245)
- [web-nfc] Pull Request: Spec toRecords() method
- Re: [web-nfc] "typedef DOMString NDEFRecordType" is expected to be case sensitive or not? (#331)
- Re: [web-nfc] "typedef DOMString NDEFRecordType" is expected to be case sensitive or not? (#331)
- Re: [web-nfc] "typedef DOMString NDEFRecordType" is expected to be case sensitive or not? (#331)
- Re: [web-nfc] Change default compatibility value to `any` (#299)
- Closed: [web-nfc] Set NDEFRecord#mediaType to "application/octet-stream" for a TNF_UNKNOWN record (#325)
- Re: [web-nfc] Set NDEFRecord#mediaType to "application/octet-stream" for a TNF_UNKNOWN record (#325)
- [web-nfc] new commits pushed by kenchris
- [web-nfc] Pull Request: Fixing #325, Set NDEFRecord#mediaType to "application/octet-stream" for a TNF_UNKN…
- [web-nfc] "typedef DOMString NDEFRecordType" is expected to be case sensitive or not? (#331)
Monday, 2 September 2019
- Re: [web-nfc] Improve the NDEF parsing algorithms (#323)
- Re: [web-nfc] Improve the NDEF parsing algorithms (#323)
- [web-nfc] onreading event does not fire in Android 6, although it is OK on Android 8 (#330)
- [web-nfc] new commits pushed by kenchris
- Re: [web-nfc] Improve the NDEF parsing algorithms (#323)
- Re: [web-nfc] Remove compatibility and optionally support MIFARE (#328)
- Closed: [web-nfc] Our tag type overview is really hard to understand (#317)
- Re: [web-nfc] Our tag type overview is really hard to understand (#317)
- [web-nfc] Records may contain ID, expose that in our API (#329)
- Re: [web-nfc] How does NFCScanOptions#recordType filter external type records? (#327)
- [web-nfc] Pull Request: Remove compatibility and optionally support MIFARE
- [web-nfc] new commits pushed by kenchris
- Closed: [web-nfc] Missing descriptions on pushing "external type" records (#324)
- [web-nfc] new commits pushed by kenchris
- [web-nfc] How does NFCScanOptions#recordType filter external type records? (#327)
- [web-nfc] Pull Request: Add algo for mapping external data to ndef, fixes #324
- Re: [web-nfc] Set NDEFRecord#mediaType to "application/octet-stream" for a TNF_UNKNOWN record (#325)
- [web-nfc] Set NDEFRecord#mediaType to "application/octet-stream" for a TNF_UNKNOWN record (#325)
- Re: [web-nfc] Missing descriptions on pushing "external type" records (#324)
- Re: [web-nfc] Missing descriptions on pushing "external type" records (#324)
- Re: [web-nfc] Missing descriptions on pushing "external type" records (#324)
- [web-nfc] Missing descriptions on pushing "external type" records (#324)