- From: <tomomi.imura@nokia.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 21:22:57 +0000
- To: <dom@w3.org>, <sa-takagi@kddi.com>
- CC: <public-web-mobile@w3.org>
On 9/20/13 12:58 AM, "ext Dominique Hazael-Massieux" <dom@w3.org> wrote: >Le vendredi 20 septembre 2013 à 12:19 +0900, Satoru Takagi a écrit : >> Since I do not have the definition completely and I am not good at >> English, I would like to know your understanding. >> What differs between "mobile web" and "mobile web applications"? Is >> one of the two a subset of other? Or does one of the two have a part >> which is not contained on the other? > >I think "mobile Web" stands for "Web used on mobile" (with all the >caveats of the previous discussions around what "mobile" itself means). > >Web applications are probably a subset of that, although what >constitutes a Web app, and how it differs from a Web site is known to be >a hard-to-decide problem; some references on this: >http://www.visionmobile.com/blog/2013/07/web-sites-vs-web-apps-what-the-ex >perts-think/ >http://people.w3.org/~dom/archives/2010/08/what-is-a-web-application/ >(if I dare cite myself :) >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-closingthegap/2013May/thread.ht >ml#msg3 I agree partially regarding the web app being a subset of mobile web. Of course, web apps can be for "desktop" as well. It is more like an intersection of a venn diagram, than a subset of either. > > >> Moreover, what differs between "apps" and "web apps"? What is the >> reason that we expect that "web apps" attracts everyone (not only >> developer but also consumer)? > >So, I have a draft document that touches upon this that I was thinking >of submitting to this group: >http://www.w3.org/2013/07/mobile-gap-analysis/taxonomy.html > >It's drafty and will clearly need to discussed in details, but at least >it hopefully provides a starting point in defining the right terms. > >(I also have another document on the strengths of Web apps vs native >apps, but it still needs further work before I bring it here) I like the "taxonomy" of web. We may want to break them down in genus and species ;-) I have had multiple occasions when I needed to explain these terms to non-technical peeps. I usually describe the "web apps" as (single-page) web that take more user-interactions, and usually built with latest technologies that requires advanced browsers, while the "web sites" interacts less with the users. However, of course the boundary is fuzzy, and even a web site with read-only article can have some interactive "widgets" in the page. I am not trying to bring back the topic, but yes, classification of "mobile" is getting too complicated these days. It is not just the hand-held devices that connect to Internet on cellular network anymore. How about wearables? Internet of Things? Google Glass is probably considered mobile, and it has a web browser that can access "mobile web" too. About native/web overwrap - all the packaged apps for web-based OS are still considered to be native apps, although they are written in HTML/JS/CSS. And hybrid app. Users actually can't even tell it the app is mostly or partially running on WebView or not. tomomi
Received on Friday, 20 September 2013 21:32:06 UTC