Re: [testing] minutes - 28 August 2013

Clarke,all,


On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org> wrote:
>
> Requirements document
>
>    <Clarke> [9]Requirements document
>
>       [9]
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zY5_C0ZK4_Z2_WMSf2MSu5pBI8tNAgmL2o-Ua_rv1Jg/edit
>
>    Clarke: is there any track changes in google doc? I couldn't
>    see what changes Giuseppe made
>    ... he highlighted it
>    ... looks like he re-organize it
>
>    Paul: there is a revision history
>
>    Clarke: let's toggle between them
>
>    Clarke: I didn't notice anything that is obviously a change.
>    Maybe we need Giuseppe to explain what changes he made next
>    time
>    ... maybe I will ask him to point out what are the changes
>

I haven't done any change. It seems that for some reason you couldn't
see my comments, This must have been a bug in google docs (actually I
lost my comments once so I had to write them again).

Please check again and see if you can see them now. If not, I've
attached a word version (but I prefer if we do the discussion on the
google doc, so check that first)

>    <scribe> ACTION: Clarke to ask Giuseppe to point out the
>    changes of the requirement document [recorded in
>    [10]http://www.w3.org/2013/08/28-webtv-minutes.html#action02]
>

You can close this action

>    <trackbot> Created ACTION-138 - Ask giuseppe to point out the
>    changes of the requirement document [on Clarke Stevens - due
>    2013-09-04].
>
>    Clarke: are there changes someone else made?
>
>    Sheau: I assume the formatting will be cleaned up later, right?
>
>    Clarke: right. Also we talked about the document organizational
>    changes last time. Such as details are inconsistent
>    ... Giuseppe wanted to normalize it a little bit
>    ... referencing general standard
>    ... we want to capture what need to be tested
>    ... let's move on to schedule
>    ... last week we had a proposal to get the table there. We are
>    almost there.
>    ... Is there an official format?
>
>    Kaz: we can have an Editor Draft version. Later on, we can use
>    HTML format to be more conformant to W3C style
>    ... I can create a static HTML file based on that
>    ... then we can ask webmaster to publish it
>
>    Clarke: are you going to do it?
>    ... If nobody else, I will work with Kaz, Giuseppe, Daniel on
>    that
>

let's not work on the html version until we  have the final text.
Otherwise we only waste time.

/g