- From: Bob Lund <B.Lund@CableLabs.com>
- Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 09:24:32 -0600
- To: Giuseppe Pascale <giuseppep@opera.com>, Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>
- CC: "public-web-and-tv@w3.org" <public-web-and-tv@w3.org>
I strongly support the 1hr weekly call option. Bob Lund > -----Original Message----- > From: public-web-and-tv-request@w3.org [mailto:public-web-and-tv- > request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Giuseppe Pascale > Sent: Friday, May 06, 2011 7:04 AM > To: Russell Berkoff; Francois Daoust > Cc: public-web-and-tv@w3.org > Subject: [HOME_NETWORK_TF] Re: HNTF call reschedule... > > On Fri, 06 May 2011 11:52:41 +0200, Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org> wrote: > > > On 05/03/2011 06:26 PM, Russell Berkoff wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> I will not be able to attend a HTNF call rescheduled for next week > >> (5/10). > > > > Understood. I also forgot to prepare the questionnaire, but given the > > above, I suggest we make do without it and use the other possibility > > mentioned during last call, in other words reschedule next call on > > Tuesday 24 May 2011 (and revert back to the usual bi-weekly schedule > > afterwards). > > > > In short and clear: > > - Tuesday 10 May 2011: No HNTF call > > - Tuesday 17 May 2011: No HNTF call > > - Tuesday 24 May 2011: HNTF call at 14:00 UTC > > - Tuesday 31 May 2011: HNTF call at 14:00 UTC > > > > Works for me. > I would also ask TF participants to evaluate if it would be better to > change the bi-weekly 1.5h call in a weekly 1h call. > This will allow us to proceed faster and should solve some schedule > conflicts that were highlighted during our first call. > > /g > > -- > Giuseppe Pascale > TV & Connected Devices > Opera Software - Sweden
Received on Friday, 6 May 2011 15:25:29 UTC