- From: Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 06 May 2011 17:17:12 +0200
- To: "Vickers, Mark" <Mark_Vickers@cable.comcast.com>
- CC: Giuseppe Pascale <giuseppep@opera.com>, Russell Berkoff <r.berkoff@sisa.samsung.com>, "<public-web-and-tv@w3.org>" <public-web-and-tv@w3.org>
+1 as well. On 05/06/2011 03:10 PM, Vickers, Mark wrote: > I'd greatly prefer a weekly one hour call. > > Thanks, > mav > > On May 6, 2011, at 6:04 AM, Giuseppe Pascale wrote: > >> On Fri, 06 May 2011 11:52:41 +0200, Francois Daoust<fd@w3.org> wrote: >> >>> On 05/03/2011 06:26 PM, Russell Berkoff wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I will not be able to attend a HTNF call rescheduled for next week (5/10). >>> >>> Understood. I also forgot to prepare the questionnaire, but given the above, I suggest we make do without it and use the other possibility mentioned during last call, in other words reschedule next call on Tuesday 24 May 2011 (and revert back to the usual bi-weekly schedule afterwards). >>> >>> In short and clear: >>> - Tuesday 10 May 2011: No HNTF call >>> - Tuesday 17 May 2011: No HNTF call >>> - Tuesday 24 May 2011: HNTF call at 14:00 UTC >>> - Tuesday 31 May 2011: HNTF call at 14:00 UTC >>> >> >> Works for me. >> I would also ask TF participants to evaluate if it would be better to change the bi-weekly 1.5h call in a weekly 1h call. >> This will allow us to proceed faster and should solve some schedule conflicts that were highlighted during our first call. >> >> /g >> >> -- >> Giuseppe Pascale >> TV& Connected Devices >> Opera Software - Sweden >> > >
Received on Friday, 6 May 2011 15:18:13 UTC