- From: Hiroyuki Aizu <hiroyuki.aizu@toshiba.co.jp>
- Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 19:10:23 +0900
- To: "Giuseppe Pascale" <giuseppep@opera.com>
- Cc: public-web-and-tv@w3.org
I support the 1hr weekly call option. It's preferable to start call at 13:00 UTC, if possible. Thanks. Hiroyuki Aizu TOSHIBA On Fri, 06 May 2011 22:04:28 +0900, Giuseppe Pascale <giuseppep@opera.com> wrote: > On Fri, 06 May 2011 11:52:41 +0200, Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org> wrote: > >> On 05/03/2011 06:26 PM, Russell Berkoff wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I will not be able to attend a HTNF call rescheduled for next week >>> (5/10). >> >> Understood. I also forgot to prepare the questionnaire, but given the >> above, I suggest we make do without it and use the other possibility >> mentioned during last call, in other words reschedule next call on >> Tuesday 24 May 2011 (and revert back to the usual bi-weekly schedule >> afterwards). >> >> In short and clear: >> - Tuesday 10 May 2011: No HNTF call >> - Tuesday 17 May 2011: No HNTF call >> - Tuesday 24 May 2011: HNTF call at 14:00 UTC >> - Tuesday 31 May 2011: HNTF call at 14:00 UTC >> > > Works for me. > I would also ask TF participants to evaluate if it would be better to > change the bi-weekly 1.5h call in a weekly 1h call. > This will allow us to proceed faster and should solve some schedule > conflicts that were highlighted during our first call. > > /g
Received on Tuesday, 10 May 2011 10:11:41 UTC