- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 00:09:49 +0100
- To: "Velleman, Eric" <evelleman@bartimeus.nl>, "public-wai-evaltf@w3.org" <public-wai-evaltf@w3.org>
Hi Eric, all, On 7.3.2014 23:46, Velleman, Eric wrote: > Discussion 3: > The question is if we want to launch an open call for nominations of websites for discussion 1 (see above) or if we want to organize this in another way? This could quickly get our of hand as many people may see an opportunity to get a free evaluation. There are also legal issues.. > > What is in it for us? > We get more motivated participants because they can nominate websites. Downside: legal issues and expectations I agree about the expectations issue, which is very critical. But to your question: I was under the impression that we already have enough nominees to select from - did we not select a website yet? *Note to everyone*: Please avoid posting any website names on this public mailing list (or in the minutes). Best, Shadi -- Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ Activity Lead, W3C/WAI International Program Office Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group (ERT WG) Research and Development Working Group (RDWG)
Received on Sunday, 9 March 2014 23:10:19 UTC