- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@sidar.org>
- Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 00:33:25 +1000
- To: shadi@w3.org, "'Chris Ridpath'" <chris.ridpath@utoronto.ca>
- Cc: public-wai-ert@w3.org
This assumes that all the other factors are the same (result, confidence if we keep it, etc). Which is probably ging to work out feasible. Where there are different results for the same test (a page has 15 images, and 11 have alt attributes, and two of them use the filename "espacio.jpg", and one of them is 4k of text) there will still be multiple results I guess. But cmpacting some is probably better than compacting none... cheers Chaals On Thu, 07 Apr 2005 00:21:08 +1000, Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > Chris Ridpath wrote: >> Johannes proposed: >> <earl:line>3</earl:line> >> <earl:column>19</earl:column> >> <earl:xpath>/html[1]/body[1]/p[1]/map[1]/area[2]</earl:xpath> >> <earl:near rdf:parseType="Literal"><![CDATA[<area href="foo.jpg" >> alt="foo">]]></earl:near> >> >> Johannes also proposed putting the whole thing inside: >> <earl:location> >> <rdf:Seq> > > Sorry for being so vague, I do mean the latter one. Something like this: > > <earl:location> > <rdf:Seq> /* or Bag, Collection, etc */ > <rdf:li> > <earl:xpath .../> > <earl:line .../> > <earl:coloumn .../> > /* whatever else we can provide */ > </rdf:li> > </earl:location> > > This means, each earl:location describes one occurrence of the result in > a subject but there could be any number of occurrences in a single > assertion. An occurrence could also be composed of more than one part, > for example image maps was suggested. > > What do you think of that? > > Regards, > Shadi > > -- Charles McCathieNevile Fundacion Sidar charles@sidar.org +61 409 134 136 http://www.sidar.org
Received on Wednesday, 6 April 2005 14:33:51 UTC