Hi Paul, > I thought the idea was to use EARL as a click through from a WAI logo > to demonstrate compliance of an accessible website. Not sure what you mean by "click through", I think it is rather supplementing Web pages with EARL results. > If this is the case, then it won't necessarily add much more value > to its current use, as it will not actually prove anything. True. The intent is not to *prove* accessibility but provide more credibility and granularity than the logos. Please also see: <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2005Apr/0016.html> > It will only describe a list of test cases results as collated from > various sources, which will still not include every test case > performed by an auditor. Can you provide an example when a test performed by an auditor would/should not be included in the list of results? Regards, ShadiReceived on Monday, 4 April 2005 17:51:45 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:52:49 UTC