Re: ERT Action Item: Use Case Scenarios for EARL

Hi Paul,

> I thought the idea was to use EARL as a click through from a WAI logo 
> to demonstrate compliance of an accessible website.

Not sure what you mean by "click through", I think it is rather
supplementing Web pages with EARL results.

> If this is the case, then it won't necessarily add much more value 
> to its current use, as it will not actually prove anything.

True. The intent is not to *prove* accessibility but provide more
credibility and granularity than the logos. Please also see:

> It will only describe a list of test cases results as collated from 
> various sources, which will still not include every test case 
> performed by an auditor.

Can you provide an example when a test performed by an auditor
would/should not be included in the list of results?


Received on Monday, 4 April 2005 17:51:45 UTC