- From: Evangelos Vlachogiannis <evlach@aegean.gr>
- Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 10:48:43 +0300
- To: public-wai-ert-tsdtf@w3.org
Hi Christophe, Christophe Strobbe wrote: > > Hi Vangelis, > > At 14:07 29/08/2006, Evangelos Vlachogiannis wrote: >> Hi Christophe, all, >> >> Some more minor comments:The source Element Type: >> In case we use an example from WCAG techniques for instance, >> should/how we refer? > > "source" is strictly speaking only intended for borrowed test > files/samples, and I have until now assumed that they have a URI/URL of > their own instead of being embedded in another document like the WCAG > techniques. > At first sight, the examples in the techniques document have an id (in > the H5 element above each example), so we can create URLs these > examples. But to support references to them from the source element, I > would need to rename an element (sourceFile) and make the testSuite > element optional. > Any thoughts or comments? > This sounds me reasonable. Alternatively we could have RefContext (ex. Techniques for WCAG 2.0 - http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20-TECHS/) and RefResource (ex. Combining adjacent image and text links for the same resource - http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20-TECHS/#H2) elements instead of TestSuite and sourceFile respectively. > >> The technicalSpec Element Type >> ".. element for each file format used by the test case". Maybe need to >> clarify: what about inline css? consider replace with something like >> "technology used" > > OK, I have changed this in the document. I'll post a new version later > this week. > > >> The disabilities Element Type >> I was wondering if we could use a more generic term like "UserProfile" >> so that TCDL could met more generic scope. > > Hmm, yes, but then we need to define this UserProfile from scratch and > we would like to start creating test samples as soon as possible. I had in mind something like: <UserProfile> <attribute> <name>disability</name> <value>deafness</value> </attribute> ... </UserProfile> But, sure I agree, time is a big issue here. Best regards, Vangelis
Received on Thursday, 31 August 2006 07:48:44 UTC