Re: w3process-ISSUE-51 (SoTD): What to do with the Status section? [Document life cycle (ch 7)]

On Nov 9, 2013, at 10:50 AM, "Charles McCathie Nevile" <chaals@yandex-team.ru> wrote:

> On Sat, 09 Nov 2013 09:57:16 +0100, Sylvain Galineau <galineau@adobe.com> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 11/9/13 4:41 PM, "Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker"
>> <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote:
>> 
>>> w3process-ISSUE-51 (SoTD): What to do with the Status section? [Document
>>> life cycle (ch 7)]
>>> 
>>> http://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/51
>>> 
>>> Raised by: Elika Etemad
>>> On product: Document life cycle (ch 7)
>>> 
>>> In an email, Fantasai asked if we really should have a status section at
>>> all, since she says it is mostly boilerplate that nobody reads.
>> 
>> I think Elika was asking whether we could move the boilerplate out of the
>> status section as the former effectively defeats the purpose of the latter.
> 
> Maybe. There's a range of ways to look at what we do, I just wanted something in the tracker because my memory isn't always powered up. And because it came up in a different thread at the same time.

I thought the question whether the status section is required by "Process" or required by "Pubrules."

I have no objection to it being the purview of pubrules.

Ian

--
Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org)   http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/
Tel: +1 718 260 9447

Received on Saturday, 9 November 2013 14:55:22 UTC