- From: Charles McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
- Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2013 17:50:25 +0100
- To: "Revising W3C Process Community Group" <public-w3process@w3.org>, "Sylvain Galineau" <galineau@adobe.com>
On Sat, 09 Nov 2013 09:57:16 +0100, Sylvain Galineau <galineau@adobe.com>
wrote:
>
>
> On 11/9/13 4:41 PM, "Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker"
> <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote:
>
>> w3process-ISSUE-51 (SoTD): What to do with the Status section? [Document
>> life cycle (ch 7)]
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/51
>>
>> Raised by: Elika Etemad
>> On product: Document life cycle (ch 7)
>>
>> In an email, Fantasai asked if we really should have a status section at
>> all, since she says it is mostly boilerplate that nobody reads.
>
> I think Elika was asking whether we could move the boilerplate out of the
> status section as the former effectively defeats the purpose of the
> latter.
Maybe. There's a range of ways to look at what we do, I just wanted
something in the tracker because my memory isn't always powered up. And
because it came up in a different thread at the same time.
cheers
--
Charles McCathie Nevile - Consultant (web standards) CTO Office, Yandex
chaals@yandex-team.ru Find more at http://yandex.com
Received on Saturday, 9 November 2013 09:50:58 UTC