- From: Charles McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
- Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2013 17:50:25 +0100
- To: "Revising W3C Process Community Group" <public-w3process@w3.org>, "Sylvain Galineau" <galineau@adobe.com>
On Sat, 09 Nov 2013 09:57:16 +0100, Sylvain Galineau <galineau@adobe.com> wrote: > > > On 11/9/13 4:41 PM, "Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker" > <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote: > >> w3process-ISSUE-51 (SoTD): What to do with the Status section? [Document >> life cycle (ch 7)] >> >> http://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/51 >> >> Raised by: Elika Etemad >> On product: Document life cycle (ch 7) >> >> In an email, Fantasai asked if we really should have a status section at >> all, since she says it is mostly boilerplate that nobody reads. > > I think Elika was asking whether we could move the boilerplate out of the > status section as the former effectively defeats the purpose of the > latter. Maybe. There's a range of ways to look at what we do, I just wanted something in the tracker because my memory isn't always powered up. And because it came up in a different thread at the same time. cheers -- Charles McCathie Nevile - Consultant (web standards) CTO Office, Yandex chaals@yandex-team.ru Find more at http://yandex.com
Received on Saturday, 9 November 2013 09:50:58 UTC