- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 19:29:47 -0800
- To: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- CC: Charles McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>, Revising W3C Process Community Group <public-w3process@w3.org>, Sylvain Galineau <galineau@adobe.com>
Sylvain Galineau wrote: > > I think Elika was asking whether we could move the boilerplate out of the > status section as the former effectively defeats the purpose of the latter. That was indeed a complaint I have. :) But the boilerplate isn't required by the Process, but by pubrules. Ian Jacobs wrote: > > I thought the question whether the status section is required by "Process" or required by "Pubrules." > > I have no objection to it being the purview of pubrules. Actually, the issue that was raised was that while the Process might mandate *what* information is in the document, it should not mandate *where* that information is placed. (Secondary issue was, should this really be part of the chapter on how to move a document through the REC track, or perhaps a different chapter?) ~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 13 November 2013 07:47:13 UTC