Re: w3process-ISSUE-51 (SoTD): What to do with the Status section? [Document life cycle (ch 7)] from Sylvain Galineau on 2013-11-09 (public-w3process@w3.org from November 2013)

From: Sylvain Galineau <galineau@adobe.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2013 00:57:16 -0800
To: Revising W3C Process Community Group <public-w3process@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CEA419B9.10270%galineau@adobe.com>

On 11/9/13 4:41 PM, "Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker"
<sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote:

>w3process-ISSUE-51 (SoTD): What to do with the Status section? [Document
>life cycle (ch 7)]
>
>http://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/51

>
>Raised by: Elika Etemad
>On product: Document life cycle (ch 7)
>
>In an email, Fantasai asked if we really should have a status section at
>all, since she says it is mostly boilerplate that nobody reads.

I think Elika was asking whether we could move the boilerplate out of the
status section as the former effectively defeats the purpose of the latter.

Received on Saturday, 9 November 2013 08:57:44 UTC