Re: Some interesting things that show up when using a reasoner to classify schema.org

Martin
I enthusiastically agree that users should be able to use these vocabularies without a deep understanding.
As a very interested and  naïve user, the size of the vocabulary worries me.  I find it difficult to orient myself
and choose the right level and the right terms which are appropriate for my application.

Dick McCullough 
Context Knowledge Systems 
What is your view? 
 


On Friday, January 23, 2015 2:16 AM, "martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org" <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org> wrote:
  

>
>
>Strangely, the Web page for http://schema.org/Floatis almost empty.
>
>I think we also rather need a datatype http://schema.org/Decimal.
>
>
>Best wishes / Mit freundlichen Grüßen
>
>Martin Hepp
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>martin hepp
>e-business & web science research group
>universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen
>
>e-mail:  martin.hepp@unibw.de
>phone:   +49-(0)89-6004-4217
>fax:     +49-(0)89-6004-4620
>www:    http://www.unibw.de/ebusiness/(group)
>        http://www.heppnetz.de/(personal)
>skype:   mfhepp 
>twitter: mfhepp
>
>Check out GoodRelations for E-Commerce on the Web of Linked Data!
>=================================================================
>* Project Main Page: http://purl.org/goodrelations/
>
>
>
>
>On 18 Jan 2015, at 20:19, Simon Spero <sesuncedu@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Disturbing things that show up etc.
>> 
>> The number of children (and adults) for which a Lodging reservations can be made can be a floating point number.
>> 
>> This would be useful for Procrustes, except he doesn't require reservations, as he can always find a way to fit you in.
>> 
>
>
>
>