- From: <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>
- Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 22:01:59 +0200
- To: Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>
- Cc: Jeff Young <jyoung@oclc.org>, Charles McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>, Dan Scott <dan@coffeecode.net>, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>, "Peter F.Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>, "Wallis,Richard" <Richard.Wallis@oclc.org>, Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>, W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>
I think that a multi-type approach is much cleaner than using a property that modifies the meaning of an existing conceptual element. Also, schema:FictionalTing is imo a pretty intuitive concept. We would mainly have to agree that all other types essentially include fictional and non-fictional entities, but afaik that is not a real problem, since being fictional is a vague quality anyway. Martin On 20 Oct 2014, at 21:44, Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com> wrote: > So this is very much like... > > Richard's proposal : http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/FictionalThing > > Where he does something like: > > <div itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/Place"> > <link itemprop="additionalType" href="http://schema.org/FictionalThing"/> > City of: <span itemprop="name">Paris</span><br/> > > But Jeff, your saying to perhaps do something like: > > <div itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/Place" fictional="true"> > City of: <span itemprop="name">Paris</span><br/> > > Yes ? No ? > > > On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Young,Jeff (OR) <jyoung@oclc.org> wrote: > If the movie and the director are both fictional, then schema:fictional=true could be assigned to both separately. The relationship between them would be schema:director (which doesn’t need to be tagged as “fictional”). > > > > The fact that a fictional movie might happen to be schema:genre=”Science fiction” is merely a coincidence. > > > > Jeff > > > > From: Thad Guidry [mailto:thadguidry@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, October 20, 2014 3:23 PM > To: Young,Jeff (OR) > Cc: chaals@yandex-team.ru; Dan Scott; Dan Brickley; Peter F.Patel-Schneider; Wallis,Richard; martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org; Karen Coyle; <public-vocabs@w3.org> > Subject: Re: Person and fictional Re: VideoGame proposal > > > > Jeff... ok... > > > > Is this... > > schema:fictional false; # to be pedantic about it > > > > A property to be used on ANY Schema.org Type ? How would it work against say... > > > > <div itemscope itemtype ="http://schema.org/Movie"> > <h1 itemprop="name">Avatar</h1> > <span>Director: <span itemprop="director">James Cameron</span> (born August 16, 1954)</span> > <span itemprop="genre">Science fiction</span> > <a href="../movies/avatar-theatrical-trailer.html" itemprop="trailer">Trailer</a> > </div> > > > What would the changes needed look like on the code above , if both itemtype="http://schema.org/Movie" and itemprop="director" were both Fictional ? > > > > -- > > -Thad > > +ThadGuidry > Thad on LinkedIn > > > > On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Young,Jeff (OR) <jyoung@oclc.org> wrote: > > Here’s how I imagine splitting the hair: > > > > _:A0 > > a schema:Book; > > schema:name “Anna Karenina”; > > schema:fictional false; # to be pedantic about it > > schema:about _:A1; > > schema:genre “Fiction”; > > . > > > > _:A1 > > a schema:Person; > > schema:fictional true; > > schema:name “Anna Karenina”; > > . > > > > > > > > > > > -- > -Thad > +ThadGuidry > Thad on LinkedIn
Received on Monday, 20 October 2014 20:02:31 UTC