- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 23:33:29 -0700
- To: "martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org" <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>, Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>
- CC: Jeff Young <jyoung@oclc.org>, Charles McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>, Dan Scott <dan@coffeecode.net>, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>, "Wallis,Richard" <Richard.Wallis@oclc.org>, Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>, W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>
But then there would need to be a default mechanism built into schema.org. Either that, or there would have to be NonfictionalThing to signal that a service, for example, was actually something that could be obtained, instead of a trial drone. peter On 10/20/2014 01:01 PM, martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org wrote: > I think that a multi-type approach is much cleaner than using a property that modifies the meaning of an existing conceptual element. Also, schema:FictionalTing is imo a pretty intuitive concept. > > We would mainly have to agree that all other types essentially include fictional and non-fictional entities, but afaik that is not a real problem, since being fictional is a vague quality anyway. > > Martin > > > > On 20 Oct 2014, at 21:44, Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com> wrote: > >> So this is very much like... >> >> Richard's proposal : http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/FictionalThing >> >> Where he does something like: >> >> <div itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/Place"> >> <link itemprop="additionalType" href="http://schema.org/FictionalThing"/> >> City of: <span itemprop="name">Paris</span><br/> >> >> But Jeff, your saying to perhaps do something like: >> >> <div itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/Place" fictional="true"> >> City of: <span itemprop="name">Paris</span><br/> >> >> Yes ? No ? >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Young,Jeff (OR) <jyoung@oclc.org> wrote: >> If the movie and the director are both fictional, then schema:fictional=true could be assigned to both separately. The relationship between them would be schema:director (which doesn’t need to be tagged as “fictional”). >> >> >> >> The fact that a fictional movie might happen to be schema:genre=”Science fiction” is merely a coincidence. >> >> >> >> Jeff >> >> >> >> From: Thad Guidry [mailto:thadguidry@gmail.com] >> Sent: Monday, October 20, 2014 3:23 PM >> To: Young,Jeff (OR) >> Cc: chaals@yandex-team.ru; Dan Scott; Dan Brickley; Peter F.Patel-Schneider; Wallis,Richard; martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org; Karen Coyle; <public-vocabs@w3.org> >> Subject: Re: Person and fictional Re: VideoGame proposal >> >> >> >> Jeff... ok... >> >> >> >> Is this... >> >> schema:fictional false; # to be pedantic about it >> >> >> >> A property to be used on ANY Schema.org Type ? How would it work against say... >> >> >> >> <div itemscope itemtype ="http://schema.org/Movie"> >> <h1 itemprop="name">Avatar</h1> >> <span>Director: <span itemprop="director">James Cameron</span> (born August 16, 1954)</span> >> <span itemprop="genre">Science fiction</span> >> <a href="../movies/avatar-theatrical-trailer.html" itemprop="trailer">Trailer</a> >> </div> >> >> >> What would the changes needed look like on the code above , if both itemtype="http://schema.org/Movie" and itemprop="director" were both Fictional ? >> >> >> >> -- >> >> -Thad >> >> +ThadGuidry >> Thad on LinkedIn >> >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Young,Jeff (OR) <jyoung@oclc.org> wrote: >> >> Here’s how I imagine splitting the hair: >> >> >> >> _:A0 >> >> a schema:Book; >> >> schema:name “Anna Karenina”; >> >> schema:fictional false; # to be pedantic about it >> >> schema:about _:A1; >> >> schema:genre “Fiction”; >> >> . >> >> >> >> _:A1 >> >> a schema:Person; >> >> schema:fictional true; >> >> schema:name “Anna Karenina”; >> >> . >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> -Thad >> +ThadGuidry >> Thad on LinkedIn >
Received on Tuesday, 21 October 2014 06:33:58 UTC