Re: action status type

It appears to me that if you use part of you are going to be 
actually using quite a bit of  As you may know, I am not a fan of 
several of the choices (and apparent choices) made in, so I would 
advise caution in using any part of


On 11/01/2014 02:31 PM, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ wrote:
> On 11/01/2014 09:56 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
>> Is this potential action stuff, including the -input and -output
>> constraints and their alternative textual representation being
>> considered as a possible representation for actions in the Social Web WG?
> Currently we discuss at least recommending particular sub types of
> to use as types of as:Activity. I've just send
> separate email to this list here, proposing work on official mapping
> from Activity Streams 2.0 to Myself I would find it
> very attractive possibility to after some tweaking simply recommend
> using directly.
> When it comes to issues with -input and -output, I think we really need
> to discuss it together, Social WG, Hydra CG to compare all 3
> currently existing approaches. I also plan to follow up on Sandro's
> suggestion and get familiar with current W3C work on Data Shapes[1].
> More than happy to welcome your contributions based on expertise in that
> field :)

Received on Saturday, 1 November 2014 23:03:51 UTC