- From: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
- Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2014 22:31:56 +0100
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>, "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
On 11/01/2014 09:56 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > Is this potential action stuff, including the -input and -output > constraints and their alternative textual representation being > considered as a possible representation for actions in the Social Web WG? Currently we discuss at least recommending particular sub types of schema.org/Action to use as types of as:Activity. I've just send separate email to this list here, proposing work on official mapping from Activity Streams 2.0 to schema.org/Action. Myself I would find it very attractive possibility to after some tweaking simply recommend using schema.org/Action directly. When it comes to issues with -input and -output, I think we really need to discuss it together schema.org, Social WG, Hydra CG to compare all 3 currently existing approaches. I also plan to follow up on Sandro's suggestion and get familiar with current W3C work on Data Shapes[1]. More than happy to welcome your contributions based on expertise in that field :) https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes
Received on Saturday, 1 November 2014 21:34:05 UTC