- From: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
- Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2014 22:10:06 +0100
- To: "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
- CC: m.hausenblas@acm.org
Aloha, https://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas#Introduction "In scope include collaborations on mappings, tools, extensibility and cross-syntax interoperability." Schema.org overlaps in many ways with other vocabularies, also those published under W3C namespace or currently under development in various W3C groups. Few examples: * http://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-org/ * http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-activitystreams-vocabulary-20141023/ * http://www.hydra-cg.com/spec/latest/core/ * https://web-payments.org/specs/source/vocabs/payswarm.html I know about at least one effort of providing some mappings: http://schema.rdfs.org/ Still as for today, If I publish data online using Activity Streams 2.0, which ~= schema.org/Action, search engines sponsoring schema.org will not understand it. Maybe we could put more emphasis in WebSchemas group on coordinating development of vocabularies, at least among various W3C groups, and try to eventually provide official mappings to schema.org which search engines could adopt in their own pace? We could take as a concrete use case Activity Streams 2.0 which we currently work on in Social WG. As I mentioned it maps almost directly to schema.org/Action Mahalo
Received on Saturday, 1 November 2014 21:12:15 UTC