Re: action status type

On 11/01/2014 09:09 PM, Jason Douglas wrote:
> Yes, potential actions are a "template" for future action instances and
> therefore a bit different.  For example, it doesn't make much sense to
> use the *-input stuff on completed actions.
> We did try several iterations of the proposal where action templates
> were a distinct class hierarchy, but discarded them as unusable.
could you please provide links to those discarded proposals and relevant

Received on Saturday, 1 November 2014 20:21:57 UTC