Re: action status type

On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 1:19 PM, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <> wrote:

> On 11/01/2014 09:09 PM, Jason Douglas wrote:
> > Yes, potential actions are a "template" for future action instances and
> > therefore a bit different.  For example, it doesn't make much sense to
> > use the *-input stuff on completed actions.
> >
> > We did try several iterations of the proposal where action templates
> > were a distinct class hierarchy, but discarded them as unusable.
> could you please provide links to those discarded proposals and relevant
> discussions?

I can probably dig into some old docs and clean them up to make them
presentable. Give me a sec, I'll share them with you in a bit.

Received on Tuesday, 4 November 2014 18:55:37 UTC