- From: Jason Douglas <jasondouglas@google.com>
- Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2014 20:09:16 +0000
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>, "public-vocabs@w3.org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Received on Saturday, 1 November 2014 20:09:44 UTC
Yes, potential actions are a "template" for future action instances and therefore a bit different. For example, it doesn't make much sense to use the *-input stuff on completed actions. We did try several iterations of the proposal where action templates were a distinct class hierarchy, but discarded them as unusable. -jason We did several iterations where these were kept separate, including this published one... but in the end felt the On Wed Oct 29 2014 at 11:04:40 AM Peter F. Patel-Schneider < pfpschneider@gmail.com> wrote: > I was just looking at some aspects of actions in schema.org > > I noticed that actions can have a status with belongs to ActionStatusType, > an > enumeration with three members - ActiveActionStatus, CompletedActionStatus, > and PotentialActionStatus. > > It seems to me that the active and completed status is for particular > actions, > e.g., playing a piece of music on my laptop. Potential status appears to > be > better suited for action types, e.g., playing a piece of music for whoever > requests it, and not for particular actions. This appears to be a > mismatch to me. > > Similarly, potential actions on things appear to be action types, not > actions. > > > How are these issues resolved? > > > peter > >
Received on Saturday, 1 November 2014 20:09:44 UTC