- From: Dan Scott <dan@coffeecode.net>
- Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 15:40:39 -0400
- To: Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>
- Cc: "martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org" <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>, "Wallis,Richard" <Richard.Wallis@oclc.org>, Jarno van Driel <jarno@quantumspork.nl>, Niklas Lindström <lindstream@gmail.com>, Laura Dawson <Laura.Dawson@bowker.com>, Vicki Tardif Holland <vtardif@google.com>, W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 10:10:55AM -0500, Thad Guidry wrote: >+1 That is fine for associatedMedia....but...web developers want more and >expect more from us ... they have consistently been asking me for: Quick and dirty proposal for associatedMedia is at https://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/associatedMediaToThing >We still will need to move the "about" property onto Thing to solve a few >more grand problems in Schema.org. I suspect you're right about that, too. Poor Thing is getting heavier, but at least CreativeWork is getting lighter in the bargain :)
Received on Tuesday, 20 May 2014 19:41:16 UTC