- From: Jocelyn Fournier <jocelyn.fournier@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 23:41:23 +0200
- To: Dan Scott <dan@coffeecode.net>, Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>
- CC: "martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org" <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>, "Wallis,Richard" <Richard.Wallis@oclc.org>, Jarno van Driel <jarno@quantumspork.nl>, Niklas Lindström <lindstream@gmail.com>, Laura Dawson <Laura.Dawson@bowker.com>, Vicki Tardif Holland <vtardif@google.com>, W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Le 20/05/2014 21:40, Dan Scott a écrit : > On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 10:10:55AM -0500, Thad Guidry wrote: >> +1 That is fine for associatedMedia....but...web developers want more >> and >> expect more from us ... they have consistently been asking me for: > > Quick and dirty proposal for associatedMedia is at > https://www.w3.org/wiki/WebSchemas/associatedMediaToThing > >> We still will need to move the "about" property onto Thing to solve a few >> more grand problems in Schema.org. > > I suspect you're right about that, too. Poor Thing is getting heavier, > but at least CreativeWork is getting lighter in the bargain :) > Hi, http://schema.org/interactionCount would also make sense on Thing as well. For now, I have "like" interactions associated with a http://schema.org/Product, but no way to add the proper markup on them. Thanks, Jocelyn
Received on Tuesday, 20 May 2014 21:41:54 UTC