- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 14:43:28 -0400
- To: public-vocabs@w3.org
- Message-ID: <5377ADD0.6080401@openlinksw.com>
On 5/17/14 4:37 AM, Melvin Carvalho wrote: > > > > On 17 May 2014 01:10, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com > <mailto:danbri@google.com>> wrote: > > [...] > > I think there's a difference of perspective here. For schema.org > <http://schema.org> at > least, it is perfectly fine to have a named subtype to indicate that > some but not all CreativeWorks are EmailMessages, without requiring > there to be distinguishing machine-friendly attributes for the > subtype. So we're happy with it as-is currently. Is there some > specific application this this situation breaks? > > > Hi Dan > > I think both you are Kingsley are on the same page on this. > > What I think kingsley is asking for is some simple *machine readable* > attributes on the page to say that EmailMessage is a subClassOf > CreativeWorks Yes. That's achievable by simply adding an entry in the HTML based properties table for human readers. Simply have "An Email Message" above the HTML based properties table isn't clean, consistent, or coherent. -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Saturday, 17 May 2014 18:43:54 UTC