Re: Email Message Definition?

On 17 May 2014 01:10, Dan Brickley <> wrote:

> [...]
> I think there's a difference of perspective here. For at
> least, it is perfectly fine to have a named subtype to indicate that
> some but not all CreativeWorks are EmailMessages, without requiring
> there to be distinguishing machine-friendly attributes for the
> subtype. So we're happy with it as-is currently. Is there some
> specific application this this situation breaks?

Hi Dan

I think both you are Kingsley are on the same page on this.

What I think kingsley is asking for is some simple *machine readable*
attributes on the page to say that EmailMessage is a subClassOf

Maybe just put a couple of tags in the "breadcrumbs" at the top?

> Dan

Received on Saturday, 17 May 2014 08:37:40 UTC