Re: Email Message Definition?

On 17 May 2014 01:10, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote:

> [...]
>
> I think there's a difference of perspective here. For schema.org at
> least, it is perfectly fine to have a named subtype to indicate that
> some but not all CreativeWorks are EmailMessages, without requiring
> there to be distinguishing machine-friendly attributes for the
> subtype. So we're happy with it as-is currently. Is there some
> specific application this this situation breaks?
>

Hi Dan

I think both you are Kingsley are on the same page on this.

What I think kingsley is asking for is some simple *machine readable*
attributes on the page to say that EmailMessage is a subClassOf
CreativeWorks

Maybe just put a couple of tags in the "breadcrumbs" at the top?


>
> Dan
>
>