- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 14:33:28 -0400
- To: public-vocabs@w3.org
- Message-ID: <5377AB78.901@openlinksw.com>
On 5/16/14 7:10 PM, Dan Brickley wrote: > [...] > > I think there's a difference of perspective here. For schema.org at > least, it is perfectly fine to have a named subtype to indicate that > some but not all CreativeWorks are EmailMessages, without requiring > there to be distinguishing machine-friendly attributes for the > subtype. So we're happy with it as-is currently. I know you are, but that really isn't my point or particular concern, assuming schema.org is supposed to be a collaborative effort. > Is there some > specific application this this situation breaks? > > Dan > > This isn't about breaking what exists, It's actually about understanding what's being described in the present by schema.org. -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Saturday, 17 May 2014 18:33:54 UTC