- From: Justin Boyan <jaboyan@google.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 12:51:55 +0000
- To: Albert Willis <alwillis@mac.com>, W3C public vocabs <public-vocabs@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CABJSzUtQ8ZOJ0bRqb6-1z2ysSgtTtzmNbgU8sutCA-utShiGMQ@mail.gmail.com>
I think adding a 'host' or 'organizer' property alongside attendee and performer on schema.org/Event would make sense. I also think adding a new subtype, say, schema.org/CivicEvent, is a no-brainer. The accessibility and amenities issues should be considered more broadly - and perhaps they go with the Place rather than the Event. Finally, IMO, issuesToAddress is unlikely to be used consistently as a structured field so that data should probably just be part of the event description. Justin On Thu, Jun 19, 2014, 5:31 AM, Albert Willis <alwillis@mac.com> wrote: > Working on a project and I need to markup meetings of community members of > a city or neighborhood to address a civic issue and nothing in > http://schema.org/Event fits. > > Ideally, I’d like a version of Event with the following changes: > > > - instead of a performer, it would be a convener (or host) which would > be a Person or Organization > - instead of workPerformed, it would be issuesToAddress (something > that’s not a CreativeWork) > - markup to indicate if an RSVP is required > - a contactPoint for the meeting (like we see in > http://schema.org/Organization) for RSVPs or additional information > - markup for amenities offered (food, child care) to make it more > convenient for people to attend > - should be able to specify whether the location has affordances for > people in wheelchairs, etc. > - should be able to indicate if there will be translation available > for non-native speakers > - should be able to indicate whether sign language for deaf people > will be available > > > Most of the meetings I attend are hosted by ad hoc or temporary entities > (committees, working groups, etc.) that aren’t formal Organizations, so the > http://schema.org/Organization markup doesn’t work well for that either, > but that’s another issue. > > In the short term, any suggestions for a combination of markup I could use > to indicate some of these attributes? > > Longer term, I’m happy to participate in a process for new schema.org > vocabulary to address these issues. > > Thanks. > > > — Al > > > --- > Al Willis > alwillis@mac.com >
Received on Wednesday, 25 June 2014 12:52:23 UTC