- From: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 14:58:18 +0200
- To: Justin Boyan <jaboyan@google.com>, Albert Willis <alwillis@mac.com>, W3C public vocabs <public-vocabs@w3.org>
On 06/25/2014 02:51 PM, Justin Boyan wrote: > I think adding a 'host' or 'organizer' property alongside attendee and > performer on schema.org/Event <http://schema.org/Event> would make > sense. I also think adding a new subtype, say, schema.org/CivicEvent > <http://schema.org/CivicEvent>, is a no-brainer. The accessibility and > amenities issues should be considered more broadly - and perhaps they go > with the Place rather than the Event. Finally, IMO, issuesToAddress is > unlikely to be used consistently as a structured field so that data > should probably just be part of the event description. I agree that accessibility and amenities Place fits better. Also already while ago I suggested adding host/organizer property for events. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vocabs/2013Nov/0082.html( > > On Thu, Jun 19, 2014, 5:31 AM, Albert Willis <alwillis@mac.com > <mailto:alwillis@mac.com>> wrote: > > Working on a project and I need to markup meetings of community > members of a city or neighborhood to address a civic issue and > nothing in http://schema.org/Event fits. > > Ideally, I’d like a version of Event with the following changes: > > * instead of a performer, it would be a convener (or host) which > would be a Person or Organization > * instead of workPerformed, it would be issuesToAddress (something > that’s not a CreativeWork) > * markup to indicate if an RSVP is required > * a contactPoint for the meeting (like we see in > http://schema.org/Organization) for RSVPs or additional information > * markup for amenities offered (food, child care) to make it more > convenient for people to attend > * should be able to specify whether the location has affordances > for people in wheelchairs, etc. > * should be able to indicate if there will be translation > available for non-native speakers > * should be able to indicate whether sign language for deaf people > will be available > > > Most of the meetings I attend are hosted by ad hoc or temporary > entities (committees, working groups, etc.) that aren’t formal > Organizations, so the http://schema.org/Organization markup doesn’t > work well for that either, but that’s another issue. > > In the short term, any suggestions for a combination of markup I > could use to indicate some of these attributes? > > Longer term, I’m happy to participate in a process for new > schema.org <http://schema.org> vocabulary to address these issues. > > Thanks. > > > — Al > > > --- > Al Willis > alwillis@mac.com <mailto:alwillis@mac.com> >
Received on Wednesday, 25 June 2014 13:12:45 UTC