Re: markup for a community meeting?

On Jun 25, 2014, at 8:51 AM, Justin Boyan <> wrote:

> I think adding a 'host' or 'organizer' property alongside attendee and performer on would make sense. I also think adding a new subtype, say,, is a no-brainer. The accessibility and amenities issues should be considered more broadly - and perhaps they go with the Place rather than the Event.

That’s what I meant to say—accessibility attributes belong to the Place. And yes, amenities are also related to the Place.

In addition, I think creating markup to describe the services (the community/civic equivalent of the business-oriented offered by the host (or organizer) of the CivicEvent would be helpful.

> Finally, IMO, issuesToAddress is unlikely to be used consistently as a structured field so that data should probably just be part of the event description.

That’s possible, but I’m willing to explore a least a high level way of describing topics to be discussed at a CivicEvent.

Thanks for the feedback.

  — Al

Received on Thursday, 26 June 2014 06:53:03 UTC