W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-vocabs@w3.org > June 2014

Re: Music schema proposal

From: Wallis,Richard <Richard.Wallis@oclc.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 15:47:05 +0000
To: Vicki Tardif Holland <vtardif@google.com>
CC: Dan Scott <dan@coffeecode.net>, "<public-vocabs@w3.org>" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
Message-ID: <7164CF7E-DFCA-4C9E-B21D-BD4E0DA182D1@oclc.org>
Overall the proposal is good - couple of comments:

  *   Not so sure as Dan that MusicComposition would be a good fit for a MusicalScore - I think that probably deserves its own subType of CreativeWork to handle the sheet music aspects, and relationships to performed/recorded music.
  *   MusicGroup seems to negate performances by individuals (that are not Organizations, but are Persons)
  *   It seems to me that building on ItemList would be a better way to handle tracks on an Album or PlayList and ordering
  *   I am not understanding the relationship between an Album and an albumRelease of it.  Would this be the difference between the digital and vinyl versions?
  *   How does this proposal relate to singles - that are ether tracks on many albums or not on any albums?


On 16 Jun 2014, at 16:20, Vicki Tardif Holland <vtardif@google.com<mailto:vtardif@google.com>> wrote:

On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Dan Scott <dan@coffeecode.net<mailto:dan@coffeecode.net>> wrote:
One quick note: the proposed http://schema.org/genre already exists
with the definition "Genre of the creative work"; how about changing the
proposal so that the definition of "genre" simply becomes something like
"Genre of the creative work or group" with a correspondingly widened

Good catch. I'll change the description.

- Vicki

Vicki Tardif Holland | Ontologist | vtardif@google.com<mailto:vtardif@google.com>
Received on Monday, 16 June 2014 15:47:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:49:32 UTC