- From: Jarno van Driel <jarnovandriel@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 23:04:25 +0200
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Cc: Simon Spero <sesuncedu@gmail.com>, W3C Web Schemas Task Force <public-vocabs@w3.org>, phil.barker@hw.ac.uk, ivan@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CADK2AU3yV6qRD9CuX2Gdy3wLd6VRJvr10UMi_F+JMTn+YiqKdQ@mail.gmail.com>
> > "...There are mechanisms for jumping out of the nested hierarchy, for > example the itemref property in microdata allows links to be made between > items described in separate sections on a webpage is supported within > schema.org..." In regards to this: Microdata's @itemid (global identifier) is now supported by Google. Both Google's Webmaster Tools and Structured Data Testing Tool show the proper data being extracted. @itemref stills generates duplicate instances of data in the graph. By referring to an @itemid instead of using @itemref you no longer have all the duplicates. (all be it @itemid and @itemref can't always be swopped as they are different beasts and work differently) 2014-06-05 21:58 GMT+02:00 Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com> : > So that is the extent of the relationship, i.e., there is no > organizational link between W3C and schema.org then? If so, I'll fix the > Wikipedia infobox shortly. > > peter > > > > On 06/05/2014 12:06 PM, Simon Spero wrote: > >> This is the first real post to public-vocabs: >> >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vocabs/2011Sep/0001.html >> >> On Jun 5, 2014 3:00 PM, "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" < >> pfpschneider@gmail.com >> <mailto:pfpschneider@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> I'm not saying that you are saying anything wrong. I was just >> surprised. >> Does anyone know the actual situation? I was unable to find any >> announcement. >> >> I also note that the Infobox in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ >> __Schema.org >> >> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schema.org> lists W3C as an organizer >> for >> schema.org <http://schema.org>. This information was introduced by >> a Wes >> >> Turner on 27 May 2013, but there does not appear to be any source for >> the >> information. >> >> peter >> >> On 06/05/2014 11:42 AM, Phil Barker wrote: >> >> On 05/06/14 19:07, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: >> >> Is W3C part of the schema.org <http://schema.org> initiative? >> >> >> >> Sorry, my mistake. It'll be fixed tomorrow. >> >> Phil >> >> peter >> >> >> On 06/05/2014 08:57 AM, Phil Barker wrote: >> >> Hello all. >> I hope you don't mind me using this list to advertise a >> briefing paper which >> aims to describe schema.org <http://schema.org>. I also >> invite >> >> comments and discussion on how it >> might be improved in future revisions. >> >> As part of our work for Creative Commons on managing the >> Learning Resource >> Metadata Initiative (LRMI), Cetis today publish a new >> technical briefing paper >> “What is schema.org? <http://schema.org?>”. >> >> >> We often find that when explaining the technology >> approach of >> LRMI we are >> mostly talking about schema.org <http://schema.org>, so >> this >> briefing, which describes the >> schema.org <http://schema.org> specification for a >> technical >> >> audience should be of interest to >> anyone thinking about implementing or using LRMI in a >> website >> or other tool. >> It should also be of interest to people who plan to use >> schema.org <http://schema.org> for >> >> describing other types of resource. >> >> You can download the briefing from >> http://publications.cetis.ac.__uk/2014/960 >> >> <http://publications.cetis.ac.uk/2014/960> >> >> Best regards, Phil >> >> >> >> >> >> > -- *Jarno van Driel* Technical & Semantic SEO Consultant 8 Digits - Digital Marketing Technologies Tel: +31 652 847 608 Google+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/+JarnovanDriel Linkedin: linkedin.com/pub/jarno-van-driel/75/470/36a/
Received on Thursday, 5 June 2014 21:04:53 UTC